Baskaran Vs State rep by The Inspector of Police

PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Act, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest by the respondent police in the above Cr.No.55 of 2026 on the file of the respondent.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Vinodh Kumar For Respondent : Mr.P.Dhileepan Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶12

ORDER

¶13

The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 332(b), 115(2) of BNS (449, 323 of IPC) read with Section 4 of TNPHW Act , in Crime No.55 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail.

¶14

1/5

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

Crl.O.P.No.8604 of 2026 2. The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in an intoxicated mood entered into the defacto complainant’s premises and caused

¶17

damages to the property and also attacked her with hands. Hence, the case.

¶18

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the FIR came to be registered on 09.03.2026 and the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶19

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that, in the alleged occurrence, no one sustained injuries, however he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶20

Taking into consideration the totality of the circumstances and the

¶21

fact that there is no injury to any one and since custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶22

2/5

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

Crl.O.P.No.8604 of 2026

¶25

6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, before the learned Additional Mahila Court, Vellore, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only), with two sureties each, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, and on further conditions:

¶26

(a) If the petitioner fails to surrender before the

¶27

concerned learned Magistrate within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled;

¶28

(b) The sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the application for surety ship (Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019]'. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of identify proofs to ensure their identity;

¶29

(c) The petitioner shall stay at Erode and report before the Inspector of Police, Erode Town Police Station daily at 10.30 and 05.30.p.m., for a period of 15 days and thereafter as and when required;

¶30

(d) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate actions against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the

¶31

3/5

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

Crl.O.P.No.8604 of 2026 conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on anticipatory bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji v. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560];

¶34