Allowed¶21

Logaprakash v. The Inspector of Police

Bail condition – relaxation – daily reporting before police

Madras HC2 Apr 2026CRL OP/8290/2026

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court; CRL.O.P.No.8290 of 2026; Logaprakash vs The Inspector of Police, Sankari Police Station, Salem District (Crime No.146 of 2025); Section 528 BNSS; relaxation of bail condition; daily signing/reporting before respondent police at 10.00 a.m.; C.M.P.No.2565 of 2025 dated 17.09.2025; Crl.M.P.No.706 of 2026 dated 18.03.2026; Principal Sessions Judge, Salem; 157 days compliance, two days non-compliance; order set aside and conditions relaxed; petition allowed on 02.04.2026; single judge C.KUMARAPPAN, J.

What did the court decide?

Setting aside of the order dated 18.03.2026 in Crl.M.P.No.706 of 2026 and relaxation of the conditions imposed in para 6(iii) of C.M.P.No.2565 of 2025 dated 17.09.2025 (daily signing before the respondent police). ¶21

Logaprakash Vs The Inspector of Police — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

CRL.O.P.No.8290 of 2026

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 02.04.2026

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN

¶6

CRL.O.P.No.8290 of 2026

¶7

Logaprakash ... Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

The Inspector of Police, Sankari Police Station, Salem District. Crime No.146 of 2025 ... Respondent

¶10

Prayer :- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS praying to set aside the order in Crl.M.P.No.706 of 2026 dated 18.03.2026 and modify the conditions imposed in para 6(iii) in C.M.P.No.2565 of 2025 dated 17.09.2025 on the file of the Principal Sessions Judge, Salem.

¶11

For Respondent : M/s. P.Dhileepan Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

¶12

¶13

Page 1 of 4

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

CRL.O.P.No.8290 of 2026

¶16

O R D E R

¶17

This petition has been filed to set aside the order passed in Crl.M.P.No.706 of 2026 dated 18.03.2026 and modify the conditions imposed in para 6(iii) in C.M.P.No.2565 of 2025 dated 17.09.2025 on the file of the

¶18

Principal Sessions Judge, Salem.

¶19

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that, even according to the order passed in C.M.P.No.2565 of 2025 dated 17.09.2025, the petitioner was directed to sign before the respondent police daily at 10.00.a.m., until further orders ( for a minimum of 30 days), however the petitioner has complied for 157 days and since the petitioner has not complied for two days, the Court below has rejected the application for relaxation.

¶20

Taking into consideration of the totality of the circumstances and the ground that the bail was granted on 17.09.2025, this Court is inclined to set aside the order passed in Crl.M.P.No.706 of 2026 dated 18.03.2026 and relax the conditions imposed in C.M.P.No.2565 of 2025 dated 17.09.2025.

¶21