Ananthan v. State Rep by
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner sought to quash an FIR. The Government Advocate submitted that the Magistrate had already closed the case under Section 468(2) Cr.P.C. due to limitation. The petition was closed accordingly.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.O.P.No.8041 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 26.03.2026
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
Crl.O.P.No.8041 of 2023 and Crl.MP.No.5099 of 2023
Ananthan
... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The State Rep. By The Inspector of Police, Thirunavalur Police Station, Villupuram District (crime No.207 of 2017) 2.Ajithkumar
... Respondents
Prayer: Criminal Original petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to call for the entire records pertaining to the FIR in crime No.207 of 2017 pending on the file of the Inspector of Police, Thirunavalur Police Station, Villupuram District and quash the same.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ananthan
- respondent
The State Rep. By The Inspector of Police, Thirunavalur Police Station, Villupuram District
- respondent
Ajithkumar
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court