Dismissed¶33

Dinesh v. The State rep.by

Madras HC9 Mar 2026CRL OP/5937/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court (C. Kumarappan, J.), 09-03-2026, CRL OP No. 5937 of 2026 - Dinesh S/o.Kamaraj v. The State (Inspector of Police, Periyapalayam Police Station, Cr.No.37 of 2026) - bail application under S.483 BNSS DISMISSED - alleged offences: BNS Ss.126(b), 296(b), 132, 351(3) + CLA S.7(1)(a) + Arms Act S.25(1-A) - grounds: two pending NDPS cases and one other case, prior misuse of bail liberty, interest of society at large - counsel: A.Vijayasankar (petitioner); S. Vinoth Kumar, Government Advocate (Criminal side) (respondent).

What did the court decide?

From the Government Advocate's submissions it appeared that the petitioner has two NDPS cases and another (IPC) case pending against him. ¶27

Dinesh Vs The State rep.by — Narcotics (NDPS) | Madras HC (2026)

¶1

CRL OP No. 5937 of 2026

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 09-03-2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C. KUMARAPPAN

¶6

CRL OP No. 5937 of 2026

¶7

Dinesh S/o.Kamaraj, No.228, Kilampakkam, Athivakkam, Uthukkottai, Tiruvallur District.

¶8

..Petitioner(s)

¶9

¶10

The State represented by: The Inspector of Police, Periyapalayam Police Station, Tiruvallur District. Cr.no.37 of 2026.

¶11

..Respondent(s)

¶12

PRAYER: The Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of petitioner arrest

¶13

in Cr.No.37 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police.

¶14

For Petitioner(s): Mr. A.Vijayasankar For Respondent(s): Mr. S. Vinoth Kumar, Government Advocate (Criminal side).

¶15

ORDER

¶16

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 29.01.2026 for the alleged offences under Sections 126(b), 296(b), 132 and 351(3) of B.N.S. read with Section 7(1)(a) of CLA and Section 25(1-A) of

¶17

Arms Act in Crime No.37 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

¶18

Page1 of 4

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

CRL OP No. 5937 of 2026

¶21

The case of the prosecution is that on 29.01.2026 at about 4 p.m.,

¶22

when the respondent police were on routine surveillance near Jayapuram Junction, they found the petitioner in possession of knife and was threatening

¶23

the public and abusing in filthy language and also threatened the police. Hence the case.

¶24

The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He would further submit that due to a wordy quarrel between the petitioner and the police, this false case has been foisted against the petitioner, nobody was injured and the petitioner is ready and willing to abide by any condition that may be imposed by this Court and hence prayed to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶25

The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) strongly objected to enlarge the petitioner on bail on the ground that there are three other previous cases pending against the petitioner, among which, two cases have been registered under NDPS Act.

¶26

From the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate, it

¶27

appears that the petitioner is having two NDPS cases in his credit and yet another IPC case. Further it is amply clear from the submissions made by the

¶28

Page2 of 4

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

CRL OP No. 5937 of 2026

¶31

learned Government Advocate that whenever the petitioner is enlarged on bail,

¶32

he had misused the liberty granted to him and again committed similar nature of offences. In such view of the position, though the petitioner has been under incarceration from 29.01.2026, taking into consideration of the interest of society at large, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail at this juncture.

¶33

Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.

09-03-2026

MJS

Note:

Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.

¶38

All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code.

¶39

¶40

1.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

¶41