Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

R.Narayanasamy Vs The State Represented by — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

Home
Madras HC
2026
R.Narayanasamy Vs The State Represented byR.Narayanasamy v. The State Represented by

Dismissed¶27

R.Narayanasamy v. The State Represented by

Madras HC5 Mar 2026CRL OP/5722/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court order dated 05-03-2026; CRL OP No. 5722 of 2026 and Crl.MP.No.4264 of 2026; quashing of FIR under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023; FIR Crime No.95 of 2023 dated 01.03.2023, Erumapatty Police Station, Namakkal; petitioners R.Narayanasamy, N.Sugumar, Poonji Nayudu; respondent 2 Kalaiselvan.P (Thalaimalai Seva Trust); investigation completed, final report filed through e-filing (LTN202200019 1 4C202500318) before Judicial Magistrate, Senthamangalam on 23.11.2025; petition dismissed, miscellaneous petition closed; Justice M. Nirmal Kumar.

What did the court decide?

Recording the submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor (that the investigation was completed and the final report had been filed before the Judicial Magistrate, Senthamangalam, on 23.11.2025), the Criminal Original Petition seeking quashing of the FIR is dismissed, and the connected miscellaneous petition (Crl.MP.No.4264 of 2026) is closed.

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Dismissed

Issue for consideration

Whether the FIR in Crime No.95 of 2023 dated 01.03.2023 on the file of the 1st respondent Police (Erumapatty Police Station) should be quashed as illegal and without jurisdiction under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023.

Court's answer

Recording the submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor (that the investigation was completed and the final report had been filed before the Judicial Magistrate, Senthamangalam, on 23.11.2025), the Criminal Original Petition seeking quashing of the FIR is dismissed, and the connected miscellaneous petition (Crl.MP.No.4264 of 2026) is closed.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Madras High Court (M. Nirmal Kumar, J.), CRL OP No. 5722 of 2026 decided 05-03-2026: Three petitioners sought quashing, under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, of the FIR in Crime No.95 of 2023 dated 01.03.2023 of Erumapatty Police Station, Namakkal, as illegal and without jurisdiction. When the matter was taken up, the Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the investigation was complete and the final report had been filed through e-filing (printed reference LTN202200019 1 4C202500318) before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Senthamangalam, on 23.11.2025. Recording that submission, the Court dismissed the Criminal Original Petition and closed the connected Crl.MP.No.4264 of 2026.

A

CRL OP No. 5722 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 05-03-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR

CRL OP No. 5722 of 2026 and Crl.MP.No.4264 of 2026

R.Narayanasamy Son of V.Ramasamy Naidu, 2/236, Varikkal Palayam, Udayakulamputhur P.O., Thottiyam Taluk, Trichy - 621 215.

N.Sugumar Son of T.Nandagoban, 2/79, Nadu Veethi, Sevinthipatti, P.O.,Thottiyam (Via), Mohanur Taluk,Namakkal - 621215.

Poonji Nayudu Son of Thalamu Naidu, 3/66, Periya Vasal, Jambumadai Village, Vadavathur P.O., Mohanur Taluk, Namakkal - 637 013.

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

The State Represented by The Inspector of Police, Erumapatty Police Station, Namakkal.

Kalaiselvan.P Son of Not Known, Arankavalar, Thalaimalai Seva Trust, Erumapatty,Namakkal District.

..Respondent(s)

__________ Page1 of 4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

CRL OP No. 5722 of 2026

PRAYER:

PRAYER: The criminal original petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, to quash the impugned FIR in Crime No.95 of 2023 dated 01.03.2023 on the file of the 1^st respondent Police, and to quash the same as illegal and without jurisdiction and thus render justice.

For Petitioner(s): Mr.G.Harshavarthan For Respondent(s): Mr.LEONARD ARUL JOSEPH SELVAM ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for R1

ORDER

The criminal original petition has been filed to quash the impugned FIR in Crime No.95 of 2023 dated 01.03.2023 on the file of the 1^st respondent Police and to quash the same.

2.When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent Police submitted that the investigation in this case has been completed and the final report has also been filed through e-filing in LTN202200019 1 4C202500318, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Senthamangalam, on 23.11.2025.

Page2 of 4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

CRL OP No. 5722 of 2026

3.Recording the submission made by the learned Additional Public

Prosecutor, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

05-03-2026

Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No sms

To

The State Represented by The Inspector of Police, Erumapatty Police Station, Namakkal.

2.The Public Prsoecutor High Court, Madras.

__________ Page3 of 4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

CRL OP No. 5722 of 2026

M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.

sms

CRL OP No. 5722 of 2026

05-03-2026

__________ Page4 of 4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Issues for consideration

1 issue framed by the court

AI extract

1.
Whether the FIR in Crime No.95 of 2023 dated 01.03.2023 on the file of the 1st respondent Police (Erumapatty Police Station) should be quashed as illegal and without jurisdiction under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023.¶18
The court held
Recording the submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor (that the investigation was completed and the final report had been filed before the Judicial Magistrate, Senthamangalam, on 23.11.2025), the Criminal Original Petition seeking quashing of the FIR is dismissed, and the connected miscellaneous petition (Crl.MP.No.4264 of 2026) is closed.ratio¶26-27

Statutes considered

1 provisions across 1 enactments

AI extract

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023528¶18

Procedural history

How this case reached the court

AI extract

Order under challenge
FIR in Crime No.95 of 2023 dated 01.03.2023 registered on the file of the 1st respondent Police (Erumapatty Police Station, Namakkal), sought to be quashed as illegal and without jurisdiction.¶18
Erumapatty Police Station (1st respondent Police) · 01.03.2023
Prior proceeding
Submission of the Additional Public Prosecutor, recorded when the matter was taken up on 05-03-2026: investigation completed and final report filed through e-filing (reference as printed: LTN202200019 1 4C202500318) before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Senthamangalam, on 23.11.2025.¶22

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
R.Narayanasamy Son of V.Ramasamy Naidu¶6
G.Harshavarthan
petitioner
N.Sugumar Son of T.Nandagoban¶7
G.Harshavarthan
petitioner
Poonji Nayudu Son of Thalamu Naidu¶8
G.Harshavarthan
respondent
The State Represented by The Inspector of Police, Erumapatty Police Station, Namakkal¶11
LEONARD ARUL JOSEPH SELVAM
respondent
Kalaiselvan.P Son of Not Known, Arankavalar, Thalaimalai Seva Trust, Erumapatty, Namakkal District¶12

Coram

AI extract

M. Nirmal Kumarauthor¶4

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Madras HC
Decided on: 5 Mar 2026 · March
Registered: 3 Mar 2026
Case no.: CRL OP/5722/2026
CNR: HCMA010355292026
Bench: M. Nirmal Kumar
Disposal: DISMISSED
Case type: CRL OP

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from M. Nirmal Kumar

Malathi Vs State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police
4 Mar 2026
Sakthivel Vs State Rep by
4 Mar 2026
Dinesh Kumar Vs The Commissioner of Police
4 Mar 2026
K.N.Baskaran Vs K.M.Boodass
5 Mar 2026
Srikanth Vs The State Rep. by the Inspector of Police
5 Mar 2026
Aakash Vs The State Rep by Inspector of Police
5 Mar 2026

Cite this judgement

R.Narayanasamy v. The State Represented by, CRL OP/5722/2026 (MAD), decided on 5 March 2026.

The Madras High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Statutes1

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023528

View all statutes

Procedural history2

FIR in Crime No.95 of 2023 dated 01.03.2023 registered on the file of the 1st respondent Police (Erumapatty Police Station, Namakkal), sought to be quashed as illegal and without jurisdiction.Erumapatty Police Station (1st respondent Police) · 01.03.2023
Submission of the Additional Public Prosecutor, recorded when the matter was taken up on 05-03-2026: investigation completed and final report filed through e-filing (reference as printed: LTN202200019 1 4C202500318) before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Senthamangalam, on 23.11.2025.

View full history

Bench / Coram

M. Nirmal Kumar

Parties & counsel