Disposed
Gowthaman v. State Rep. by
Madras HCCRL OP/5590/2026
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petition to quash an FIR was rendered infructuous because the police had filed a final report and closed the case as 'mistake of fact'. Recording the State's submission, the High Court closed the petition.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Crl.O.P. No. 5590 of 2026
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
¶3
DATED: 16.03.2026
¶4
CORAM
¶5
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR
¶6
Crl.O.P. No. 5590 of 2026
¶7
&
¶8
Crl.M.P. No. 4220 of 2026
¶9
Gowthaman
¶10
..Petitioner
¶11
Vs.
¶12
State rep. by Inspector of Police, Srimushnam Police Station, Cuddalore.
¶13
..Respondent
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Gowthaman
- respondent
State rep. by Inspector of Police, Srimushnam Police Station, Cuddalore
Coram
AI extract
M. Nirmal Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court