Manikandan v. State Rep by
Case brief
What is this about?
Madras HC Crl.O.P.22618/2023 (25.02.2026): quash petition under Section 528 BNSS/Section 482 CrPC regarding C.C.44/2022 (Crime 486/2019, Chitlapakkam) before JM-I Tambaram dismissed as withdrawn; trial commenced, all witnesses except Investigating Officer examined; relied on High Court Bar Association vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2024) 6 SCC 267 - exceptional circumstance found, disposal directed preferably within two months; personal appearance of petitioners dispensed with except specified stages; connected Crl.M.Ps. closed.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as withdrawn on counsel's endorsement; connected miscellaneous petitions (Crl.M.P.Nos.15817 & 15818 of 2023) closed; personal appearance of petitioners before the trial Court dispensed with subject to specified stages (receipt of copies, answering charges, Section 313 questioning, passing of judgment, and other dates required by the trial Court), with representation through counsel; Judicial Magistrate No.I, Tambaram, Chennai directed to dispose of C.C.No.44 of 2022 expeditiously, preferably within two months from receipt of a copy of the order, as an exceptional circumstance.