S.Sukumar v. State Rep.by
Case brief
What is this about?
Quashing of criminal proceedings on compromise between parties — C.C.No.129 of 2019, Judicial Magistrate No.I, Poonamallee; F.I.R Cr.No.414 of 2017, Central Crime Branch EDF-II, Vepery, Chennai; Final Report under Sections 406 and 420 r/w 34 I.P.C.; dispute over building construction agreement, allotment of undivided space and non-payment of money; Section 482 Cr.P.C. petitions by accused S. Sukumar, S. Kavitha and Muhammed Rafee against the State (Inspector of Police, CCB) and M. Ashok Chand; joint compromise memo filed, original and parent documents to be entrusted to de facto complainant; reliance on Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and Anr., (2012) 10 SCC 303; petitions allowed, Final Report quashed, connected Crl.M.P.No.11439 of 2019 closed; Madras High Court, Justice D. Bharatha Chakravarthy, order dated 15.07.2026.
What did the court decide?
Both Criminal Original Petitions allowed on the terms of the joint compromise memo; the Final Report in C.C.No.129 of 2019 before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Poonamallee stands quashed; consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition (Crl.M.P.No.11439 of 2019) is closed.