Vinoth v. State Represented by Inspector of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
Madras High Court bail order, CRL OP No. 17405 of 2026, C. Kumarappan J., decided 07-07-2026. Bail petition under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in Crime No.48 of 2026, AWPS Hosur, for Sections 87, 137(2) BNS and 5(1), 5(n) r/w 6(1) POCSO Act (abduction and aggravated penetrative sexual assault of 17-year-old victim). Victim's section 183 BNSS statement (JM No.2 Hosur, 29.05.2026) did not implicate petitioner; no further custodial interrogation needed; bail granted on Rs.25,000 bond with two sureties, Special Court for POCSO Court Krishnagiri, daily reporting 10.30 a.m., conditions per P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala (2005) 13 SCC 283, fresh FIR under Section 269 B.N.S. if absconding.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner ordered released on bail on executing a bond of Rs.25,000/- with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Special Court for POCSO Court, Krishnagiri, subject to conditions: sureties to affix photographs/left thumb impression per Judicial Form No.46 with identity proof; petitioner to report before respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders; not to abscond or tamper with evidence/witnesses; on breach the Magistrate/Trial Court may pass appropriate orders as per P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283]; if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S.