M.Venkatesan v. The State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
Madras High Court quashes FIR on compromise between parties. CRL OP No. 17259 of 2026 (with Crl.M.P.No. 11501 of 2026), decided 09-07-2026 by D. Bharatha Chakravarthy, J. Crime No. 99/2018, Thiruporur Police Station, Chengalpattu District; alleged IPC Sections 341, 294(b), 324, 427, 336 and 506(ii); incident of barging into defacto complainant's shop and damaging LED light worth Rs.15,000/- out of previous enmity; quashing sought under Section 528 BNSS with reference to Section 482 Cr.p.c.; Gian Singh v. State of Punjab, (2012) 10 SCC 303 relied on for compromise-quashing of non-compoundable offences; petitioners M.Venkatesan, K.Dhashnamoorthy, J.Ajay @ Ajeethkumar; de facto complainant S.Divagar; counsel B Mohan (petitioners), R. Rajasekaran Government Counsel (respondents).
What did the court decide?
Quashing of Crime No. 99 of 2018 on the file of the first respondent Police (Thiruporur Police Station); connected miscellaneous petition (Crl.M.P.No. 11501 of 2026) closed.