Prithivirajan v. State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail allowed - Madras High Court - 03.07.2026 - Crl.O.P.No.16974 of 2026 - Prithivirajan vs. State (Chromepet Police Station, Tamabaram City) - Crime No.120 of 2026 - Section 483 BNSS 2023 - offences under Sections 296(b), 308(4), 351(3) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 - robbery of Rs.750/- at knife point - five previous similar cases - long incarceration - stolen money recovered - investigation completed - bond Rs.25,000 with two sureties - Judicial Magistrate Pallavaram - daily reporting 10.30 a.m. for two weeks - breach conditions P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala (2005) 13 SCC 283 - fresh FIR under Section 269 BNS on absconding.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner enlarged on bail on executing a bond for Rs.25,000/- with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram, subject to conditions including affixation of photographs/thumb impression by sureties with identity proof, daily reporting before respondent police at 10.30 a.m. for two weeks and thereafter as required, no absconding, and no tampering with evidence or witnesses; on breach the Magistrate/Trial Court may take appropriate action as laid down in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala, and absconding may invite a fresh FIR under Section 269 BNS, 2023.