Ganesh Vs The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police

The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police Thiruvannamalai West Police Station, Thiruvannamalai Crime No.129 of 2026No. 197, Kumarakovil Street,Pandithapattu,Thiruvannamalai District

¶14

..Respondent/ complainant

¶15

Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Act, 2023, to enlarge the petitioners on bail, in the event of their arrest by the respondent police, pending investigation of the case in Cr.No.129 of 2026 on the file of the respondent.

¶16

For Petitioner(s): Ms.V.Karthigaipriya For Respondent(s): MR.N.PALANIVEL, GOVT.ADVOCATE (CRL.SIDE)

¶17

ORDER

¶18

The petitioners, who apprehend arrest for the alleged offences under

¶19

Section 303 (2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 read with

¶20

Page1 of 6

¶21

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶22

CRL OP No. 16547 of 2026

¶23

Section 21(1) of Mines & Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act, 1957

¶24

in Crime No.129 of 2026, on the file of the respondent police seek anticipatory bail.

¶25

The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners transported 6 units (18 cubic meters) of gravel earth in the TATA tipper lorry bearing registration No. TN.19 AB 2608, without any valid permit or licence. It is alleged that the petitioners were caught red-handed by the respondent Police while transporting the Gravel earth illegally. Hence, the case.

¶26

The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners were innocent and that they have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that they are ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this Court and they are ready to co-operate for investigation. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

¶27

The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and, upon instructions, submitted that no previous cases have been registered against the petitioners. However, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶28

I have given my anxious consideration to the submissions made by the

¶29

Page2 of 6

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

CRL OP No. 16547 of 2026

¶32

learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record.

¶33

From the submission made by the learned Government Advocate

¶34

(Crl.Side) the petitioners do not have any previous cases. Though, this Court views the offence of theft of natural resources and its exploitation as serious offence, taking into consideration of the fact that he has no previous case, and upon the fond hope that he would mend himself in future and would not come under the adverse notice of the respondent, this Court is inclined to enlarge him on anticipatory bail, subject to certain conditions.

¶35

7.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, before the Judicial MagistrateNo.II, Tiruvannamalai on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, and on further conditions:

¶36

(a) If the petitioners fail to surrender before the concerned learned Magistrate within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled;

¶37

(b) The sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the application for surety ship (Judicial Form

¶38

__________ Page3 of 6

¶39

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶40

CRL OP No. 16547 of 2026

¶41

No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019]'. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of identify proofs to ensure their identity;

¶42

(c) The petitioners are directed to produce a demand draft for a sum of Rs. 55,000/- [Rs1,10,000/2=Rs.55,00,/-] (Rupees Fifty five Thousand only) each in favour of the ‘ The Chairman/District Collector, The District Mineral Foundation Trust of Thiruvannamalai District’, (Non refundable) before the learned Judicial Magistrate-II, Tiruvannamalai.

¶43

(d) On production of the above Demand Draft, the learned Magistrate is directed to take necessary steps to hand over the same to the District Collector. Upon receipt of the said amount, the District Collector shall realise and utilise the same strictly in accordance with law and in terms of G.O.Ms.No.84, Natural Resources (MMD.1) Department, dated 16.12.2025;

¶44

(e) The petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 am for a period of four weeks;

¶45

(f) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate actions against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on anticipatory bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji v. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560];

¶46

__________ Page4 of 6

¶47

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶48

CRL OP No. 16547 of 2026

¶49

(g) If the petitioners thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS Act.

30-06-2026

JRS

To

1.The Judicial Magistrate NO.II, Tiruvannamalai. 2.The Inspector of Police Thiruvannamalai West Police Station, Thiruvannamalai Crime No.129 of 2026. 3. The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court.

¶54

__________ Page5 of 6

¶55

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶56

CRL OP No. 16547 of 2026

¶57

C.KUMARAPPAN, J.

¶58

JRS

¶59

CRL OP No. 16547 of 2026