Allowed

S Parimala priyan v. The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police

Madras HC9 Jun 2026CRL OP/14488/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought anticipatory bail for alleged offences under Sections 420, 468 and 471 IPC for submitting a forged diploma certificate to a society. Holding custodial interrogation unnecessary at that stage, the court granted anticipatory bail subject to conditions including daily police reporting and execution of a bond with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted on bond of Rs.20,000 with two sureties, subject to surrender within fifteen days and daily reporting before respondent police.

S Parimala priyan Vs The State Rep By, The Inspector of… — Cheating and Forgery | Madras HC (2026)

¶1

CRL OP No. 14488 of 2026

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 09-06-2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN

¶6

CRL OP No. 14488 of 2026

S Parimala priyan

..Petitioner

The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police Veerapandi P.S., Tiruppur District. Crime No.700/2025

¶11

..Respondent

¶12

Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Act, 2023 to grant Anticipatory Bail to the petitioner in the event of his arrest or on surrender before any court in connection with the case in Crime No.700 of 2025 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police and thus render justice.

¶13

For Petitioner: Mr.C Ramaraj For Respondent: Ms.R.S.Indira, Govt.Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶14

ORDER

¶15

The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections

¶16

420, 468, 471 of IPC, 1860 in Crime No.700 of 2025 on the file of the

¶17

Page1 of 5

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

CRL OP No. 14488 of 2026

¶20

respondent police seeks anticipatory bail.

¶21

The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner has submitted a forged

¶22

Diploma certificate to the de facto complainant society. Hence, the case.

¶23

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the defacto complainant and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that he is ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court and ready to co-operate with the investigation. Hence, he prayed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶24

The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and, upon instructions, submitted that the petitioner has submitted forged diploma certificate while getting employment in the de facto complainant society and the occurrence took place on 17.11.2025. Hence, she opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶25

5. I have given my anxious consideration to either side submissions and perused the materials available on record.

¶26

__________ Page2 of 5

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

CRL OP No. 14488 of 2026

¶29

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, taking note of the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides, considering the totality of the circumstances, this Court is of the view that at this length of time, custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required. Hence, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to certain conditions.

¶30

Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Tiruppur, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only), with two sureties each, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, and on further conditions:

¶31

(a) If the petitioner fails to surrender before the concerned learned Magistrate within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled;

¶32

(b) The sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the application for surety ship (Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019]'. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of identify proofs to ensure their identity;

¶33

(c) The petitioner shall report before the respondent Police, everyday at 10.30 a.m., and 05.30 p.m until further

¶34

Page3 of 5

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

CRL OP No. 14488 of 2026

¶37

orders;

¶38

(d) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the

¶39

learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate actions against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on anticipatory bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji v. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560];

¶40

(e) If the petitioner thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can

¶41

be registered under Section 269 of BNS Act.

09-06-2026

SHL

To:

The Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Tiruppur

¶46

The Inspector of Police Veerapandi P.S., Tiruppur District.

¶47

The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras

¶48

__________ Page4 of 5

¶49

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶50

CRL OP No. 14488 of 2026

¶51

C.KUMARAPPAN J.

¶52

SHL

¶53

CRL OP No. 14488 of 2026

¶54

09-06-2026

¶55

__________ Page5 of 5

¶56

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

S Parimala priyan v. The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S Parimala priyan v. The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Philominal Mary Vs State Rep.by its, The Inspector of Police

Manikandan Vs State Represented by Inspector of Police

Rathinammal Vs The State of Tamil Nadu represented by

Ali Vs State rep. by the Inspector of Police

Alavudeen Vs The State Rep By The Inspector of Police

Divya Vs Manimegalai