Allowed

Mukilan v. State Rep.by

Madras HC28 Apr 2026CRL OP/10813/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras granted bail to Mukilan, a traffic police accused, charged with offences under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act. The court ordered his release subject to a bond and specific reporting conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner ordered to be released on bail upon executing a bond for Rs. 15,000 with two sureties and complying with specific reporting and conduct conditions.

Mukilan Vs State Rep.by — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2026)

¶1

CRL OP No. 10813 of 2026

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 28-04-2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA CRL OP No. 10813 of 2026

Mukilan

..Petitioner(s)

State Rep.By The Inspector Police Station, K.3, Aminjikarai Police Station, Chennai District. (Crime No. 207 of 2026)

¶10

..Respondent(s)

¶11

PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail, in connection with Crime No.207 of 2026, pending investigation on the file of the respondent Police.

¶12

For Petitioner(s): Mr.R. Parthiban For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar, Govt. Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶13

ORDER

¶14

Petition seeking bail in respect of Crime No.207 of 2026 registered for

¶15

the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 115(2), 132, 351(2) and 75 of BNS r/w Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, is on board for consideration.

¶16

Page1 of 5

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

CRL OP No. 10813 of 2026

¶19

The learned counsel for the petitioner, pleading innocence on the

¶20

part of the petitioner, who has been in incarceration since 23.03.2026 and false implication in the case, seeks indulgence of this Court. He further submits that the de facto complainant is a traffic constable and she had demanded money and since it was refused to be given, a quarrel ensued and a false complaint has been lodged against him as if he had abused and assaulted her. He also submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this court.

¶21

The case of the prosecution as put forth by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police, opposing for grant of bail, is that the petitioner, along with another accused, who drove their vehicle on the wrong side, was intercepted by the de facto complainant, a traffic police and she turned off the bike and took the key and questioned them. Enraged over that the accused persons abused her in a filthy language and pushed her down by assaulting on her breast and also threatened her. He further submits that there is no previous case pending against the petitioner.

¶22

Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) for the respondent Police and perused the materials available on record and considering the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner, this court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions and accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released

¶23

Page2 of 5

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

CRL OP No. 10813 of 2026

¶26

on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned V Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai, and on further conditions that:

¶27

[a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

¶28

[b] the petitioner shall report before the Inspector of Police, K4, Anna Nagar Police Station, Chennai, everyday at 06.30

¶29

p.m., until further orders;

¶30

[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

¶31

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

¶32

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

¶33

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S.

¶34

28-04-2026

¶35

Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No VKR

¶36

__________ Page3 of 5

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

CRL OP No. 10813 of 2026

¶39

Note:

¶40

Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order on the Official Website of this Court.

¶41

2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded on Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order, when uploaded on the official website of this Court, will be watermarked and will also have a QR code.

¶42

¶43