Vinoth Kumar v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Paramakudi Taluk

Madras HC30 Mar 2026CRL MP(MD)/6786/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Vinoth Kumar v. State of Tamil Nadu (Inspector of Police, Paramakudi Taluk Police Station, Crime No.6/2026, Ramanathapuram District); CRL MP(MD) No.6786 of 2026 in Crl.OP(MD) No.828 of 2026; Madurai Bench of Madras High Court; Justice P. Dhanabal; order dated 30/03/2026; amendment of father's name from Nagarajan to Mari; correction of clerical error in earlier order dated 12.01.2026; Registry directed to correct before issuing copy; advocates P. Praveenkumar (petitioner), M. Karunanithi, Government Advocate (Crl. Side) (respondent).

What did the court decide?

Amendment of the petitioner's father's name from 'Nagarajan' to 'Mari' in Crl.OP(MD) No.828/2026 dated 12.01.2026; Registry directed to carry out the necessary correction before issuing a copy of the order to the parties concerned. ¶¶26

Vinoth Kumar Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Paramakudi Taluk — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

CRL MP(MD). No.6786 of 2026

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

Dated : 30/03/2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL

¶6

CRL MP(MD). No.6786 of 2026 in Crl.OP(MD) No.828 of 2026

Vinoth Kumar

... Petitioner

State of Tamilnadu Rep by Inspector of Police, Paramakudi Taluk Police Station, In Crime No.6/2026 Ramanathapuram District.

¶11

... Respondent

¶12

PRAYER :-

¶13

This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is filed to amend the petitioner's father name as Mari instead of Nagarajan in Crl OP(MD) No. 828/2026 dt.12.01.2026.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Praveenkumar,

¶15

For Respondent : Mr.M.Karunanithi, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶16

1/4

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

CRL MP(MD). No.6786 of 2026

¶19

ORDER

¶20

This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to

¶21

amend the petitioner's father name as Mari instead of Nagarajan in Crl OP(MD) No.828/2026, dated 12.01.2026.

¶22

According to the petitioner, the name of his father has been wrongly mentioned in the petition, which has been reflected in the order dated 12.01.2026. Hence, prays to allow the petition.

¶23

3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) has also

¶24

admitted that the petitioner's father's name was wrongly mentioned.

¶25

Being satisfied with the reasons stated by the petitioner in

¶26

the affidavit, this petition is allowed. Registry is directed to carry out the necessary correction before issuing a copy of the order to the parties concerned.

¶27

2/4

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

CRL MP(MD). No.6786 of 2026

¶30

5.Accordingly, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is

¶31

ordered.

¶32

30.03.2026