Delay condonation application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking to excuse a 55-day delay in filing a criminal revision against a Magistrate's order. Government Advocate raised no objection; delay condoned and Registry directed to number the revision if otherwise in order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.M.P.(MD)No.20738 of 2025
Crl.M.P.(MD)No.20738 of 2025 in
Crl.R.C.(MD)SR.No.86167 of 2025
MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.
Heard Mr.S.Natarajan, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Mr.P.Kottaisamy, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the Respondent.
Miscellaneous Petition has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, seeking to condone the delay of 55 days in filing the criminal revision petition against the order passed in Crl.M.P.No.17939 of 2025, dated 21.07.2025 by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.V, Tiruchirappalli.
Respondent, has stated that he has no objection to allowing this petition.
otherwise in order.
05.01.2026
gvn
Crl.M.P.(MD)No.20738 of 2025
MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.
gvn
Crl.M.P.(MD)No.20738 of 2025 in Crl.RC(MD).SR.No.86167 of 2025
05.01.2026
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 55 days in filing the criminal revision petition should be condoned.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner in Crl.R.C.(MD)SR.No.86167 of 2025
Respondent (State)
Mohammed Shaffiq
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
