Allowed

Padmanaban v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Lalapet

Madras HC15 Jun 2026CRL MP(MD)/11070/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Conviction under Sections 279, 338 and 304A IPC confirmed in appeal; petitioner sought suspension of sentence pending criminal revision. The court found arguable points and a good chance of success, allowed suspension of the substantive sentence on conditions including a bond with sureties and daily appearance, and posted the matter after four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Substantive sentence of imprisonment suspended pending disposal of the revision, subject to bond of Rs.25,000 with two sureties and daily appearance before the trial court.

Padmanaban Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2026)

¶1

Crl.M.P.(MD)No.11070 of 2026

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 15.06.2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI

¶6

CRL MP(MD) NO. 11070 of 2026 in CRL RC(MD) NO. 942 of 2026

Padmanaban

... Petitioner

Vs.

The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Lalapetti, Kulithalai Taluk, Karur District.

¶11

... Respondent

¶12

PRAYER : This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 377(1) of Cr.P.C., (U/s. 438(i) of BNSS) to suspend the sentence passed by the learned District and Sessions Judge, Karur in CA No.176 of 2023 dated 07.01.2026 confirming the judgment passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Kulithalai in CC No.88 of 2018 dated 19.09.2023 pending disposal of the criminal revision petition.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Mohamed Ibram Saibu For Respondent : Mr.C.Susikumar Government Advocate

¶14

1/6

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

Crl.M.P.(MD)No.11070 of 2026

¶17

ORDER

¶18

This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to suspend the sentence of imprisonment imposed by the learned District and Sessions Judge, Karur, in CA No.176 of 2023 dated 07.01.2026, confirming the conviction and sentence imposed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Kulithalai in CC No. 88 of 2018 dated 19.09.2023, pending disposal of the criminal revision petition.

¶19

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been convicted by the trial Court on 19.09.2023, and the trial Court sentenced him to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one month under Section 279 IPC and also to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months (3 counts) under Section 338 IPC and also to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one year under Section 304 (A) IPC concurrently, in CC No.88 of 2018 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Kulithalai.

¶20

The learned District and Sessions Judge, Karur, confirmed the conviction, and sentence and dismissed the Criminal Appeal in CA No.176 of 2023 dated 07.01.2026. Challenging the same, the present Criminal Revision

¶21

2/6

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

Crl.M.P.(MD)No.11070 of 2026

¶24

Case has been filed before this Court along with this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition seeking suspension of sentence.

¶25

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that there are several infirmities in the prosecution case, and also there are contradictions in material particulars between the evidence of the prosecution witnesses.

¶26

This Court has carefully considered the rival contentions put forward by either side and also perused the materials available on record.

¶27

The learned counsel for the petitioner pointed out that there are certain infirmities and inconsistencies in this case, and also there are certain contradictions in material particulars. The fact remains that there are arguable points involved in this criminal revision and further, the criminal revision is not likely to be taken up for final hearing in the near future and as such, and also considering the fact that the petitioner has good chance of succeeding in the revision petition, this Court is of the considered view that the petitioner herein is entitled to the relief of grant of suspension of sentence.

¶28

3/6

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

Crl.M.P.(MD)No.11070 of 2026

¶31

Accordingly, this petition is allowed and the substantive sentence of

¶32

imprisonment alone is suspended pending disposal of the revision with the following directions:

¶33

(i) The petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Kulithalai;

¶34

(ii) The sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the trial Court may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity; and

¶35

(iii) The petitioner shall appear before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Kulithalai, on all working days at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.

¶36

Mr.C.Susikumar, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the

¶37

respondent.

¶38

Post the matter after four weeks.

15.06.2026 (2/3)

4/6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶43

Crl.M.P.(MD)No.11070 of 2026

¶44

To :-

¶45

1.The District and Sessions Judge, Karur.

¶46

2.The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Kulithalai.

¶47

3.The State of Tamilnadu,

¶48

Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Lalapetti, Kulithalai Taluk, Karur District.

¶49

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor,

¶50

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶51

5/6

¶52

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶53

Crl.M.P.(MD)No.11070 of 2026

¶54

L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.

¶55

¶56

Crl. MP(MD)No. 11070 of 2026 in CRL RC(MD)No.942 of 2026 (2/3)

¶57

15.06.2026

¶58

6/6

¶59

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Padmanaban v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Lalapet

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Padmanaban v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Lalapet

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G.Sivaprabhu Vs The Superintendent of Police, Madurai

Saravanan Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police

Navaneetharaja Vs The Superintendent of Police

Karthikeyan Vs The Superintendent of Police

Chelladurai Vs The Superintendent of Police

A.Karunakaran Vs M.S. Panneerselvam