N.Palayaih v. State rep. by Inspector of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
Madras High Court; Crl.M.P.No.8861 of 2026 in Crl.O.P.No.17955 of 2025; decided 22.05.2026; single judge R.Sakthivel; Section 528 BNSS 2023; relaxation of bail/appearance condition; daily reporting to police at 10.30 a.m. for two weeks; prior order dated 30.04.2026 in Crl.O.P.No.17955 of 2025; Cr.No.10/2025 Central Crime Branch – 2 Krishnagiri District; petitioners N.Palayaih (Accused No.2) and P.Manjamma (Accused No.3); endorsement by counsel not pressing petition; dismissed as not pressed; no cases cited; no quantum involved.
What did the court decide?
In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioners stating that he does not press the petition, the Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed as not pressed. The underlying question of relaxing the daily-appearance condition was thereby left undecided. ¶19