Allowed¶22

Chandra Prakasam (Deceased) v. R.Raghu

Madras HC7 Jul 2026CRL MP/8337/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

condonation of delay; 27 days; Section 5 Limitation Act; CRL MP No. 8337 of 2026; CRL A SR No. 26554 of 2026; Crl.A.No.532 of 2024 dated 30.01.2026; Principal District and Sessions Judge Chennai; Madras High Court; Justice M. Nirmal Kumar; Chandra Prakasam (Deceased) legal heir C. Vimal Raj; R.Raghu; R.R.Traders; criminal appeal numbering and admission

What did the court decide?

Condonation of the 27-day delay in filing the appeal; petition ordered; Registry directed to number the Criminal Appeal, if otherwise in order, and post it for Admission. ¶22

Chandra Prakasam (Deceased) Vs R.Raghu — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

CRL MP No. 8337 of 2026

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 07-07-2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR

¶6

CRL MP No. 8337 of 2026 IN CRL A SR NO. 26554 OF 2026

¶7

Chandra Prakasam (Deceased) Rep by its Legal Heir, C.Vimal Raj S/o C.Chandra Prakasam, Old No.142, New No.54, Sanjeevirayan Koil Street, Old Washermenpet, Chennai.

¶8

..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. R.Raghu Proprietor of R.R.Traders, 2. R.R.Traders Rep by its Proprietor, R.Raghu, Both having address at No.4, 1st Cross Street, Thriiuvallur Nagar, Tondiarpet, Chennai. ..Respondent(s) CRL A SR No. 26554 of 2026 Chandra Prakasam (Deceased) ..Appellant(s) Vs R.Raghu ..Respondent(s)

¶9

__________ Page1 of 2

¶10

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶11

CRL MP No. 8337 of 2026

¶12

Prayer:

¶13

M.NIRMAL KUMAR J.

¶14

RSI

¶15

Prayer: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act praying to condone the delay of 27 days in filing the above appeal as against the order in Crl.A.No.532 of 2024 dated 30.01.2026 on the file of Principal District and Sessions judge, at Chennai.

¶16

For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.Rahul For Respondents: Mr.R.Muthukumar

¶17

Order

¶18

The Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is filed seeking to condone the delay of 27 days in filing the above appeal.

¶19

Heard the learned Counsel for petitioner.

¶20

Mr.R.Muthukumar, learned counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that he has no objection in condoning the delay. He will raise his objections at the time of hearing the appeal.

¶21

Today, the learned counsel for the petitioner/appellant serves copy of the petition and typed set of papers to the learned counsel for the respondents.

¶22