Dismissed¶¶27

M.Sangeetha v. R.Prakasam

Madras HC24 Jun 2026CRL MP/7465/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court; Crl.M.P.No.7465 of 2026 in Crl.O.P.No.8546 of 2026; decided 24.06.2026 by C. Kumarappan, J.; petitioner M.Sangeetha vs R.Prakasam and State (Inspector of Police, Tiruvallur Town Police Station, Crime No.0136 of 2026); cancellation of anticipatory bail; Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023; no violation of bail conditions; no grounds to cancel; Government Advocate N. Palanivel; dismissed.

What did the court decide?

On a perusal of the petition, the Court was unable to find any violation of the conditions imposed in the anticipatory bail order passed in Crl.O.P.No.8546 of 2026 dated 02.04.2026. ¶¶22

M.Sangeetha Vs R.Prakasam — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Crl.M.P.No.7465 of 2026 in Crl.O.P.No.8546 of 2026

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 24.06.2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN

¶6

Crl.M.P.No.7465 of 2026 in

¶7

Crl.O.P.No.8546 of 2026

¶8

M.Sangeetha ... Petitioner

¶9

Vs.

¶10

1.R.Prakasam

¶11

2.The State Rep. by its The Inspector of Police, Tiruvallur Town Police Station, Tiruvallur District. (Crime No.0136 of 2026)

¶12

... Respondents

¶13

PRAYER: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, praying to cancel the anticipatory bail order in Crl.O.P.No.8546 of 2026 dated 02.04.2026.

¶14

For Petitioner : No appearance For R1 : No appearance For R2 : Mr.N.Palanivel, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶15

1/4

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

Crl.M.P.No.7465 of 2026 in Crl.O.P.No.8546 of 2026

¶18

ORDER

¶19

Today (24.06.2026) when the matter was taken up for hearing, there

¶20

was no representation for the petitioner as well as the first respondent.

¶21

This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking cancellation of the anticipatory bail granted to the first respondent by this Court in Crl.O.P.No.8546 of 2026 dated 02.04.2026.

¶22

From a perusal of the petition, this Court is unable to find any violation of the conditions imposed in the anticipatory bail order passed by this Court in Crl.O.P.No.8546 of 2026 dated 02.04.2026. Therefore, this Court is of the firm view that no valid grounds have been made out to interfere with or cancel the anticipatory bail granted by this Court.

¶23

The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the second respondent also fairly submitted that there has been no violation of the conditions imposed by this Court.

¶24

2/4

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

Crl.M.P.No.7465 of 2026 in Crl.O.P.No.8546 of 2026

¶27