Allowed¶5
Santhanam v. State by, The Inspector of Police
Madras HCCRL MP/7443/2026
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Condonation of delay; 109 days; criminal appeal; Crl.M.P.; Crl.A.SR.No.23814 of 2026; Madras High Court; Government Advocate (Criminal Side) objection; affidavit reasons satisfactory; Registry to number appeal; listing for admission.
What did the court decide?
Delay of 109 days in filing the appeal condoned and the Criminal Miscellaneous Petition ordered; Registry directed to number the Criminal Appeal, if otherwise in order, and list the same for admission in due course. ¶5