Dismissed¶19

Raja v. State Rep By its, The Inspector of Police

Madras HC10 Jun 2026CRL MP/7052/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Routine withdrawal order, not precedent material: Section 430 BNSS 2023; suspension of sentence; bail pending appeal; withdrawal endorsement in Court bundle; dismissed as withdrawn; SPL.S.C.No.69 of 2022 dated 27.09.2023; Magalir Neethi Mandram (Fast Track Court), Erode; Crime No.14 of 2022, All Women Police Station, Erode; appeal CRL A No.487 of 2026 listed for final hearing 10.08.2026; Superintendent, Central Prison, Trichy. Cite only for the timeline/status of this appeal; contains no doctrinal holding, no cases cited, no quantum.

What did the court decide?

None; petition dismissed as withdrawn following counsel's endorsement in the Court bundle, so no suspension of sentence or enlargement on bail was granted by this order. ¶19

Raja Vs State Rep By its, The Inspector of Police — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

CRL MP No. 7052 of 2026

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 10-06-2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN

¶6

CRL MP No. 7052 of 2026 and CRL A No.487 of 2026

¶7

Raja S/o.Veeran, D.No.210, Pichapalimedu, Anthiyur Taluk, Erode District. Now at KMR Complex, Annaikattu, Kalinkarayanapalayam, Chithode, Erode District.

¶8

..Petitioner

¶9

¶10

State Rep By its, The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Erode District. (Crime No.14 of 2022)

¶11

..Respondent

¶12

Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 430 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, praying to suspend the sentence imposed on the petitioner by the SPL.S.C.No.69 of 2022 dated 27.09.2023 on the file of the Learned Sessions Judge, Magalir Neethi Mandram (Fast Track Court), Erode and enlarge the petitioner on bail pending disposal of the above appeal.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr. D.Arul Prakash For Respondent(s): Mr. M.Mohamed Riyaz, Government Advocate (Criminal Side)

¶14

__________ Page1 of 4

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

CRL MP No. 7052 of 2026

¶17

ORDER

¶18

After hearing arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the Petitioner/Appellant and the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the Respondent, the learned counsel for the Petitioner submitted that he will withdraw the present petition seeking suspension of sentence. To that effect, he has also made an endorsement in the Court bundle.

¶19