Allowed

Ramesh v. S.a.Arunmugam

Madras HC6 May 2026CRL MP/6365/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitions to modify a bail condition requiring deposit of Rs.10,00,000. On the Government Advocate's submission, the Court reduced the condition to Rs.5,00,000 for both cases together and directed the Magistrate to release the petitioner on such deposit.

What did the court decide?

Condition modified: deposit of Rs.5,00,000 for both cases together; Magistrate directed to release petitioner on such deposit.

Ramesh Vs S.a.Arunmugam — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2026)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 06-05-2026

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI

¶5

CRL.M.P.Nos.6365 & 6368 of 2026 in CRL.R.C.Nos.1942 & 1943 of 2025

¶6

Ramesh

¶7

..Petitioner in both petitions

¶8

¶9

S.A.Arunmugam S/o.Angappagounder, Jing Refineries Pvt Ltd., Managing Director, Rep by his Power Agent and Director, Moorthy Office at No.40, GD Road, Kamaraj Nagar, Gobichettipalayam.

¶10

..Respondent in both

¶11

petitions

¶12

Prayer in Crl.M.P.No.6365 of 2026: To modify the condition imposed in para no.4 in Crl.Rc.No.1942 of 2025 order dated 07/10/2026.

¶13

Prayer in Crl.M.P.No.6368 of 2026: To modify the condition imposed in para no.4 in Crl.Rc.No.1943 of 2025 order dated 07/10/2026.

¶14

For Petitioner : M/s.S.Shankar (In both petitions) For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath, Government Advocate. (In both petitions)

¶15

__________ Page1 of 4

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

COMMON ORDER

¶18

These Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions have been filed seeking modification of the condition imposed in paragraph No.4 of the order dated 07.10.2026 made in Crl.R.C.Nos.1942 and 1943 of 2025 on the file of this Court.

¶19

The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that the condition directing the petitioner to deposit a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- may be modified to Rs.5,00,000/- for both the cases together.

¶20

Recording the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), the condition imposed in paragraph No.4 of the order dated 07.10.2026 is modified to the effect that the petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lakhs only) for both the cases together.

¶21

It is further directed that on such deposit, the learned Judicial Magistrate concerned shall, as stated in paragraph No.4 of the order dated 07.10.2026, release the petitioner, if not required in connection with any other case, and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.

¶22

Page2 of 4

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

Accordingly, these Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions are ordered.

06-05-2026

kmm

The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

¶29

__________ Page3 of 4

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.

¶32

kmm

¶33

CRL.M.P.Nos.6365 & 6368 of 2026 in CRL.R.C.Nos.1942 & 1943 of 2025

¶34

06-05-2026

¶35

__________ Page4 of 4

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Ramesh v. S.a.Arunmugam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramesh v. S.a.Arunmugam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.Ajith Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Sub Inspector Of Police, Kanyakumari

Sankarraja Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Elayirampannai

M.Ramesh Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Cbcid

V.Karthikesan Vs The State Rep.by

Rajesh Kumar T. Vs The State Rep.by

Kaveriyappa Vs The Deputy Superintendent of Police