S.M.Ramalingam v. R.Ragini
Case brief
What is this about?
Petition to condone a 415-day delay in representing a criminal revision against a maintenance order. Respondent's counsel had no objection subject to payment of 50% of maintenance arrears; petitioner agreed to furnish a demand draft within two weeks. Matter listed for orders.
What did the court decide?
Delay condonation deferred; to be considered if petitioner pays 50% of maintenance arrears by demand draft within two weeks.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRL MP No. 3490 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 10-06-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SHAMIM AHMED CRL MP No. 3490 of 2026 in CRL RC SR No.51282 of 2024
S.M.Ramalingam S/o.Munuswamy mudaliyar, 3rd cross street, nemily road, singaperumal nagar, sriperumpudur.
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
R.Ragini W/o.S.M.Ramalingam, No.18/47, perumal street, ondithoppu, chennai - 600 079.
..Respondent(s)
Prayer: This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Order IV Rule 9(iv) of AS Rules, praying to condone the delay of 415 days in representing the Crl.R.C.No.51282 of 2024 against the order of M.C.No.132 of 2015 dated 15.04.2024 on the file of the VI Additional Family Court, chennai and pass such further or other orders as this honourable court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Should the 415-day delay in representing the criminal revision petition against a maintenance order be condoned?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.M.Ramalingam
- respondent
R.Ragini
Coram
Shamim Ahmed
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court