Allowed¶5

P.Saravanakumar v. The State Represented by The Inspector of Police

Madras HC11 Feb 2026CRL MP/2253/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Condonation of delay; 112 days; criminal appeal; Crl.M.P.No.2253 of 2026; Crl.A.SR.No.103107 of 2025; affidavit averments; Registry directed to number appeal; Madras High Court; bench of P.VELMURUGAN and M.JOTHIRAMAN; decided 11.02.2026.

What did the court decide?

Condonation of the 112-day delay in preferring the Criminal Appeal; Registry directed to number the appeal if otherwise in order. ¶5

P.Saravanakumar v. The State Represented by The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

P.Saravanakumar v. The State Represented by The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kupputhai Vs The State rep.by its, The Deputy Inspector General of Prison

B.Selvi Vs The State Rep. by Secretary to the Government

S.Mohan Vs the State Rep by Its, the Secretary to Government

Tvl. J.v.Traders Vs The State Tax officer

D.Chandrasekaran Vs Mrs. J.Flora

Dhilliyammal Vs The Principal Secretary to Government