Dismissed¶21

Rayappan v. State, Rep. by

Madras HC8 Jun 2026CRL MP/1956/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Suspension of sentence Section 389(1) CrPC 1973 petition withdrawn; CRL MP No. 1956 of 2026 in CRL A No. 131 of 2026; Madras High Court; C. Saravanan, J.; 08-06-2026; SPL.S.C.No.28 of 2020; Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases Under Pocso Act, Chengalpattu; Crime No.20 of 2019 W32 All Women Police Station Madipakkam; dismissed as withdrawn; no relief granted.

What did the court decide?

Recording the learned counsel's submission that the petition was not being pressed and the endorsement made to that effect in the Court bundle, the Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed as withdrawn; no decision was reached on the requested suspension of sentence. ¶21

Rayappan Vs State, Rep. by — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

CRL MP No. 1956 of 2026

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 08-06-2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN

¶6

CRL MP No. 1956 of 2026 IN CRL A NO. 131 OF 2026

¶7

Rayappan S/o.Raju, Flat No.3, Nanjil Tower, Medavakkam Main Road, Vadakkupattu, Kovilambakkam, Chennai-91.

¶8

..Petitioner

¶9

¶10

State, Rep. by, The Inspector of Police, W32 All Women Police Station, Madipakkam, Chennai. (Crime No.20 of 2019)

¶11

..Respondent

¶12

Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 389(1) of Code of Criminal Procedure, (Cr.P.C.,) 1973, pleased to suspend the sentence imposed against the Appellant/Accused in Judgment dated 02.01.2025 in SPL.S.C.No.28 of 2020 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Special Court For Exclusive Trial of Cases Under Pocso Act, Chengalpattu, pending disposal of the appeal and pass such other order or direction as this Court.

¶13

For Petitioner(s): Mr. K. Yuvaraja For Respondent(s): Mr. R. John Sathyan, State P.P.,

¶14

__________ Page1 of 3

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

CRL MP No. 1956 of 2026

¶17

ORDER

¶18

The matter was heard at length. At this juncture, the learned counsel for

¶19

the Petitioner/Appellant submitted that he is not pressing the present petition seeking suspension of sentence and sought permission of this Court to withdraw the same. To that effect, an endorsement has also been made in the Court bundle.

¶20