K.Umapathy v. The State Represented by its
Case brief
What is this about?
Crl.M.P.No.1622 of 2026; Crl.A.No.110 of 2026; Madras High Court; A.D.Jagadish Chandira J.; decided 17.03.2026; petitioner K.Umapathy; respondent The State rep. Inspector of Police W-21 All Women Police Station Guindy; Crime No.10 of 2019; Spl.S.C.No.35 of 2021 dated 08.10.2024; Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act Chengalpattu; filed under Section 389(1) Cr.P.C. and Section 430 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita; suspension of sentence; bail pending disposal of criminal appeal; counsel withdrew petition with endorsement; dismissed as withdrawn; advocates S.Mohamed Sahith Ali (for S.Manoharan) and J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Criminal Side).
What did the court decide?
In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner (who sought permission to withdraw the petition), the Criminal Miscellaneous Petition was dismissed as withdrawn; consequently the request to suspend the sentence and enlarge the petitioner on bail pending appeal was not adjudicated.