Disposed¶19
Sinungaraj v. Fathima Sahayaraj
Madras HCCONT P(MD)/343/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Contempt petition closed on compliance; Cont. P(MD)No.343 of 2024 in W.P.(MD)No.199 of 2023; petitioner Sinungaraj; respondents Fathima Sahayaraj (Tahsildar, Musiri Taluk Office) and Dinesh Kumar (Head Surveyor, Musiri Taluk Office), Trichy District; Section 11 Contempt of Courts Act, 1971; alleged willful disobedience of order dated 31.01.2023; decided 19.02.2026 by Justice G.R.Swaminathan, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court; advocates K.Arunraj (petitioner) and S.S.Madhavan, Additional Government Pleader (respondents).
What did the court decide?
The Court recorded that its order in W.P.(MD)No.199 of 2023 has been complied with and, accordingly, closed the contempt petition without taking punitive action. ¶19