K.Karuppasamy v. Saravanan

Madras HC30 Jan 2026CONT P(MD)/2365/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Contempt petition closed on recorded compliance — CONT.P.(MD)No.2365 of 2025 in WP(MD) No.11592 of 2025, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, 30.01.2026, B.Pugalendhi J.; petitioner T.Ramesh (adv. S.Govindan) vs TNSTC Managing Director Saravanan, General Manager Kalaivanan and Pension Fund Trust Administrator Bhama (Standing Counsel S.C.Herold Singh); filed under Section 10 of the Contempt of Courts Act for willful disobedience of order dated 24.04.2025; compliance submitted and acknowledged; petition closed with liberty to challenge afresh; no costs, no quantum.

What did the court decide?

Petition closed recording compliance; no punishment imposed, with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the same in the manner known to law. ¶¶30

K.Karuppasamy Vs Saravanan — Contempt of Court | Madras HC (2026)

¶1

CONT.P.(MD)No.2365 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 30.01.2026

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

¶6

CONT.P.(MD)No.2365 of 2025 in

¶7

WP(MD) No.11592 of 2025

T.Ramesh

... Petitioner

1.Mr. Saravanan, Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Limited, Madurai Division, Bye Pass Road, Madurai - 625 016.

¶12

2.Mr.Kalaivanan

¶13

General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Limited, Virudhunagar Region, Virudhunagar.

¶14

3.Mrs.Bhama, Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Employees Pension Fund Trust, Thiruvalluvar Illam, Pallavan Salai, Chennai – 2. ...Contemnors/Respondents

¶15

1/4

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

CONT.P.(MD)No.2365 of 2025

¶18

PRAYER:

¶19

PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 10 of the Contempt of Courts Act, praying this Court, to punish the Contemnors/Respondents for their willful disobedience of the order of this Court in W.P.(MD) No.11592 of 2025 dated 24.04.2025.

¶20

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Govindan For Respondents : Mr.S.C.Herold Singh Standing Counsel

¶21

O R D E R

¶22

This contempt petition is filed that the order of this Court in W.P.(MD) No.11592 of 2025 dated 24.04.2025 has not been complied with.

¶23

2.Today(30.01.2026), when this contempt petition is

¶24

taken up for hearing, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the above order of this Court has been complied with. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has also acknowledged the same.

¶25

2/4

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

CONT.P.(MD)No.2365 of 2025

¶28

3.Recording the aforesaid submission of the learned

¶29

counsel on either side, this contempt petition is closed, with liberty

¶30

to the petitioner to challenge the same in the manner known to law.