G.M.Ramachandran v. D.Karthikeyan, I.A.S.
Case brief
What is this about?
In this closed contempt petition, the Court was informed that the order passed in the underlying writ petition had been complied with. The matter was recorded and the petition is closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont P(MD)No.2151 of 2025
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 15.04.2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Cont P(MD)No.2151 of 2025
in
W.P(MD)No.2532 of 2016
G.M.Ramachandran
... Petitioner / Petitioner
Vs
1.D.Karthikeyan, I.A.S., Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Water Supply (ME I) Department, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009.
2.P.Madhusudhan Reddy, I.A.S., Director of Municipal Administration, O/o. the Director of Municipal Administration, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
G.M. Ramachandran
- respondent
D. Karthikeyan
- respondent
Madhusudhan Reddy
- respondent
A. Sankar
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court