this amount, which is less than Rs.10 Lakh, it is not known as to how the successful bidder, Mayil Vahanam, has invested more than Rs.1.25 Crore. In fact, the successful bidder has also claimed that he has engaged 3 to 4 persons to collecting this rent and is incurring Rs.2,000/- as salary towards his employees. It is not known as to how this is logically feasible and how the system will work. The successful bidder is not a service provider, he has invested this huge amount not for doing some social service, but has invested this amount as a business. Even calculating a bank interest at the rate of 6%, he would get not less than Rs.7,50,000/- per annum, as interest alone, for this Rs.1.25 Crore. He has to make out this amount, apart from the expenditures incurred for his staff to an extent of Rs.60,000/- per month. In order to achieve these, ultimately, he has to exploit the street vendors, squeeze them and extract more money from the street vendors or he has to permit the street vendors of his choice by receiving considerations rather than the persons who have been identified as street vendors or he has to permit street vendors in the zones which were declared as nonvending zones also. This would be the ground reality and this is how the schemes are working. Ultimately, the very object for which the scheme was framed by the Government for the welfare as well as regularizing the street vendors is defeated.”