Disposed¶21

M/s.Kaviyan Construction Pvt. Ltd. v. T.Nagarajan

Madras HC2 Mar 2026CONT P(MD)/172/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

contempt petition closed; Section 11 Contempt of Courts Act; willful disobedience; non-compliance of order in W.P.(MD)No.30570 of 2025 dated 29.10.2025; Madurai Corporation; Chairperson Taxation Appeal Committee; Commissioner; Assistant Commissioner Zone 5; M/s. Kaviyan Construction Pvt. Ltd.; Madurai Bench of Madras High Court; G.R. Swaminathan J.; compliance reported; CONT.P.(MD)No.172 of 2026.

What did the court decide?

None; contempt petition closed in view of reported compliance with the underlying order ¶21

M/s.Kaviyan Construction Pvt. Ltd. Vs T.Nagarajan — Contempt of Court | Madras HC (2026)

¶1

1 CONT.P.(MD)NO.172 OF 2026

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 02.03.2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN CONT.P.(MD)No.172 of 2026 in W.P.(MD)No.30570 of 2025

¶6

M/s.Kaviyan Construction Pvt. Ltd., Rep. By its Authorised Signatory, KR.Ganesh, S/o.K.S.Rajaram, No.180, Vaigai Colony (East), Anna Nagar, Madurai – 625 020.

¶7

... Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

Mr.T.Nagarajan, Chairperson, Taxation Appeal Committee, Madurai Corporation, Madurai. ... 1^st Contemnor / Proposed Respondent

¶10

Mr.Chitra Vijayan,IAS, Commissioner, Madurai Corporation, Madurai.

¶11

N.Sridevi, Assistant Commissioner, Zone 5, Madurai Corporation, Madurai. ... Alleged Contemnors 2&3/Respondents 1 &2

¶12

Prayer: Contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to issue contempt notice to respondent and

¶13

1/4

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

2 CONT.P.(MD)NO.172 OF 2026

¶16

punish the respondents for their willful disobedience and non-compliance of the order within the stipulated time in pursuance of the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD)No.30570 of 2025 dated 29.10.2025.

¶17

For Petitioner : Mr.E.Balamurugan For Respondents : Mr.S.Vinayak

¶18

¶19

O R D E R

¶20

It is reported that the order passed by this Court has since

¶21

been complied with. In view of the same, this contempt petition is closed.

¶22

02.03.2026

¶23