Malarvizhi v. Vikram Kapoor IAS
Case brief
What is this about?
A single judge stayed a contempt petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act due to a stay on the underlying order by a Division Bench, closing the petition with liberty to revive based on the writ appeal outcome.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition closed with liberty to file application to revive it based on the outcome of the writ appeal.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CONT.P.(MD)No.1694 of 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 09.01.2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
Cont.P.(MD)No.1694 of 2023 in W.P.(MD)No.6216 of 2021
1.R.Malavizhi
- 2.B.Ravi
- 3.V.M.Malarvizhi
4.S.Balasubramanian
... Petitioners
Vs.
- 1.Vikram Kapoor, I.A.S., The Secretary to Government, Planning, Development and Special Initiatives Department, Secretariat, Chennai.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
1.R.Malavizhi & ors
- respondent
1.Vikram Kapoor, I.A.S.
- respondent
2.S.Ganesh, I.A.S.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court