Disposed¶22

S.Vigneswaran v. Srinivasan

Madras HC11 Jun 2026CONT P(MD)/1453/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Contempt petition closed after compliance recorded; Madurai Bench of Madras High Court; Justice Hemant Chandangoudar; Section 11 Contempt of Courts Act 1971; violation of order dated 17.11.2025 in W.P(MD)No.32757 of 2025; District Registrar (Administration) Sivagangai; proceedings dated 20.05.2026; Form Nos.6 and 7 issued in name of deceased member; General Body Meeting objections rejected; liberty reserved to challenge 20.05.2026 proceedings; no costs.

What did the court decide?

Contempt petition closed without punishment; liberty reserved to the petitioner to challenge the proceedings dated 20.05.2026 in the manner known to law, if so advised; no costs. ¶22

S.Vigneswaran Vs Srinivasan — Contempt of Court | Madras HC (2026)

¶1

Cont.P(MD)No.1453 of 2026

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 11.06.2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR

¶6

Contempt Petition (MD)No.1453 of 2026 in Writ Petition(MD)No.32757 of 2025

S.Vigneswaran

..Petitioner

Srinivasan District Registrar (Administration) O/o The Registrar, D.No.1A, Thiruppathur Road, Sivagangai District.

¶11

.. Contemnor /1st Respondent

¶12

Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 praying this Court to punish the contemnor/1st respondent for the deliberate and wilful disobedience on compliance with the order dated 17.11.2025 passed by this Court in W.P(MD)No.32757 of 2025.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Dinesh

¶14

For Respondent : Mrs.K.R.Shivashankari Govt. Advocate

¶15

1/4

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

Cont.P(MD)No.1453 of 2026

¶18

ORDER

¶19

Learned Government Advocate has placed on record the proceedings dated 20.05.2026, whereby the order forming the subject matter of the present contempt petition has been complied with.

¶20

2.The petitioner had submitted objections before the first respondent contending, inter alia, that one of the members concerned was deceased and that Form Nos.6 and 7 had been issued illegally in the name of the deceased person. It was also contended that no General Body Meeting had been conducted in accordance with law. The said objections have been considered by the respondent and rejected in the proceedings dated 20.05.2026, for the reasons assigned therein.

¶21

3.In view of the subsequent proceedings dated 20.05.2026, which indicate compliance with the order alleged to have been violated, nothing further survives for consideration in the present contempt petition.

¶22

4.Accordingly, the contempt petition stands closed, reserving liberty to the petitioner to challenge the proceedings dated 20.05.2026 in the manner known to law, if so advised. No costs

¶23

11.06.2026

¶24

NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet:Yes skn

¶25

2/4

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

Cont.P(MD)No.1453 of 2026

¶28

To
Srinivasan