Kandasamy v. T.Jeyaprakasam
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought contempt punishment against Tahsildar for alleged disobedience of court order. Court noted encroachment was removed in 2020 and closed the petition.
What did the court decide?
The contempt petition was closed as the information regarding removal of encroachment was recorded.
What the court decided
Cont P(MD)No.1415 of 2021
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 09.04.2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN AND
THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.POORNIMA Cont P(MD)No.1415 of 2021
in
W.P(MD)No.17308 of 2018
Kandasamy
... Petitioner / Petitioner
Vs.
T.Jeyaprakasam, Tahsildar, Marugapuri Taluk, Trichy.
... Contemnor / 3rd Respondent
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kandasamy
- respondent
T.Jeyaprakasam
Coram
G.R.Swaminathan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court