Disposed¶20

T.Kuppusamy v. R.Gunasekaran

Madras HC18 Mar 2026CONT P/905/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court contempt petition closed (Cont.P.No.905 of 2026, 18.03.2026, G.K. Ilanthiraiyan J.); T.Kuppusamy v. R.Gunasekaran, Registrar, Puducherry University; alleged non-compliance of order dated 06.11.2025 in W.P.No.41654 of 2025; respondent passed fresh orders on 05.03.2026; Section 11, Contempt of Courts Act 1971; liberty reserved to challenge subsequent order; no precedent cited; no quantum involved.

What did the court decide?

Contempt Petition closed; petitioner given liberty to challenge the respondent's order dated 05.03.2026 in the manner known to law, if so advised. ¶20

T.Kuppusamy Vs R.Gunasekaran — Contempt of Court | Madras HC (2026)

¶1

Cont.P.No.905 of 2026

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 18.03.2026

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶6

Cont.P.No.905 of 2026

¶7

T.Kuppusamy S/o.thiruneelakandan, No.235, Throwpathi Amman Koil Street, Pillaichavadi, Boomaiyarpalayam Post, Vanur Taluk, Villupuram District – 605 104.

¶8

..Petitioner(s)

¶9

¶10

R.Gunasekaran Registrar, Puducherry University, Kalappattu, Puducherry.

¶11

..Contemnor(s)

¶12

Prayer:- Contempt petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, praying to punish the respondent herein for his wilful disobedience and non-compliance of the orders of this Court made in W.P.No.41654 of 2025 dated 06.11.2025, under the provisions of Contempt of Courts Act.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.C. Prakasam For Respondent : Mrs.A.V.Bharathi Standing Counsel

¶14

Page 1 of 4

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

Cont.P.No.905 of 2026

¶17

ORDER

¶18

This Contempt Petition has been filed to punish the respondent for non compliance of the order dated 06.11.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.41654 of 2025 , thereby directing the respondent to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks.

¶19

The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent submitted that as directed by this Court, the respondent considered the representation of the petitioner and passed order by the proceedings dated 05.03.2026. He also produced a copy of the order dated 05.03.2026 before this Court.

¶20

Recording the above submissions, the Contempt Petition stands closed. If any grievance over the order passed by the respondent, the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the same in the manner known to law, if so advised.

¶21

18.03.2026

¶22

Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No Speaking/Non Speaking order

¶23

rts

¶24

Page 2 of 4

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

Cont.P.No.905 of 2026