Contempt petition alleging wilful disobedience of an earlier writ order was withdrawn by the petitioner to file a fresh contempt petition against the contemnors; the court closed the petition preserving that liberty.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CONT P No. 389 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 23-07-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
CONT P No. 389 of 2026
A.N.Panneer Selvam
..Petitioner
Vs
..Respondents
__________ Page1 of 4
CONT P No. 389 of 2026
Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 r/w Article 215 of Constitution of India, to punish the respondents 1 and 2 have wilfully disobeyed and violated the order dated 08.04.2025 passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No. 11778 of 2025.
For Petitioner(s): Mr.P. Manish For Respondents: Mr.M.Sivavarthanan, Govt. Counsel
ORDER
Today, when the matter was called, the learned counsel for the petitioner
sought permission of this Court to withdraw this contempt petition and to file a fresh contempt petition against the contemnors.
petitioner, this Contempt petition stands closed, preserving liberty as prayed for.
23-07-2026
Index: Yes/No
Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No ak
__________ Page2 of 4
CONT P No. 389 of 2026
To
__________ Page3 of 4
CONT P No. 389 of 2026
HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J.
ak
CONT P No. 389 of 2026
23-07-2026
__________ Page4 of 4
2 provisions across 2 enactments
A.N.Panneer Selvam
Dr.R.Brimdha Devi, I.A.S., District Collector, Salem District
S.Senthil Kumar, Block Development Officer, Deviakurichi Panchayat Union
Balachandran (alias) Balu
Hemant Chandangoudar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
