Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

P Dot G Constructions Private Limited Vs G.Prakesh IAS — Contempt of Court | Madras HC (2026)

Home
Madras HC
2026
P Dot G Constructions Private Limited Vs G.Prakesh IP Dot G Constructions Private Limited v. G.Prakesh IAS

Disposed¶21

P Dot G Constructions Private Limited v. G.Prakesh IAS

Madras HC1 Apr 2026CONT P/381/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Contempt petition closed after compliance recorded; Madras High Court; Cont.P.No.381 of 2026; decided 01.04.2026 by G.K. Ilanthiraiyan, J.; petition under S.11 Contempt of Courts Act 1971 by P Dot G Constructions Private Limited against G. Prakesh IAS, Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority (CMDA); non-compliance alleged of order dated 24.09.2024 in W.P.No.25569 of 2023 directing refund of premium FSI charges for original flooring area 4029.69 sq.mt. from paid amount Rs.3,61,52,000/- less premium FSI for additional 1245.92 sq.mt.; Non Bailable Warrant executed by ACP Egmore per order dated 25.03.2026; Standing Counsel Mrs. P. Veena Suresh produced compliance report; petition closed, no punishment; counsel Mr. Ganesh for petitioner.

What did the court decide?

None; the Contempt Petition was closed on recording the respondent's compliance with the order dated 24.09.2024 in W.P.No.25569 of 2023 and the compliance report produced; no punishment imposed.

Why is it important?

Recording the learned Standing Counsel's submission that the order dated 24.09.2024 in W.P.No.25569 of 2023 has been complied with, together with the compliance report produced, the Court closed the Contempt Petition. ¶21

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

None; the Contempt Petition was closed on recording the respondent's compliance with the order dated 24.09.2024 in W.P.No.25569 of 2023 and the compliance report produced; no punishment imposed.

Issue for consideration

Whether the respondent (Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority) committed wilful disobedience of the order dated 24.09.2024 in W.P.No.25569 of 2023 and is liable to be punished for contempt.

Court's answer

Recording the learned Standing Counsel's submission that the order dated 24.09.2024 in W.P.No.25569 of 2023 has been complied with, together with the compliance report produced, the Court closed the Contempt Petition.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Contempt Petition under S.11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 by P Dot G Constructions Private Limited against G. Prakesh IAS, Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, for alleged wilful disobedience of the Madras High Court order dated 24.09.2024 in W.P.No.25569 of 2023, which directed refund of premium FSI charges collected towards the original flooring area of 4029.69 sq.mt. from the paid amount of Rs.3,61,52,000/- (after deducting the premium FSI charge for the additional area of 1245.92 sq.mt.) within four weeks. Pursuant to the Court's order dated 25.03.2026, a Non Bailable Warrant was executed by the Assistant Commissioner of Police, Egmore, and the respondent was produced. The learned Standing Counsel submitted that the order had been complied with and produced a compliance report; recording the same, the Contempt Petition was closed. (G.K. Ilanthiraiyan, J.; decided 01.04.2026.)

A

Cont.P.No.381 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 01.04.2026

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

Cont.P.No.381 of 2026

P Dot G Constructions Private Limited Represented By Its Authorized Signatory , Mr Mohan Srinivasan , Building No 66, 2nd Main Road , Kasturba Nagar, Adyar , Chennai 600 020

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

G.Prakesh IAS The Member Secretary , The Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Thalamuthu Natarajan Maaligai, No. 1 Andhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Chennai 600 008

..Contemnor(s)

Prayer:- Contempt petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, praying to punish the respondent herein for wilful disobedience of the order passed by this Hon'ble court in W.P.no. 25569 of 2023 dated 24.09.2024.

For Petitioner : Mr. Ganesh For Respondent : Mrs.P.Veena Suresh Standing Counsel

Page 1 of 4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Cont.P.No.381 of 2026

ORDER

This Contempt Petition has been filed to punish the respondent

for non compliance of the order dated 24.09.2024, passed by this Court in

W.P.No.25569 of 2023, thereby directing the respondent to refund the premium FSI Charges collected towards original flooring area of 4029.69 sq.mt., as per order dated 05.08.2022 from the paid amount of Rs.3,61,52,000/- after deducting the premium FSI charge for the additional area of 1245.92 sq.mt., within a period of four weeks.

As directed by this Court by an order dated 25.03.2026, the Assistant Commissioner of Police, Egmore, has executed the Non Bailable Warrant issued by this Court and produced the respondent before this Court.

The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent submitted that the order passed by this Court has been complied with and she also produced a compliance report before this Court.

Recording the above submission, the Contempt Petition stands

closed.

01.04.2026

Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No Speaking/Non Speaking order rts

Page 2 of 4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Cont.P.No.381 of 2026

To

The Member Secretary , The Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Thalamuthu Natarajan Maaligai, No. 1 Andhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Chennai 600 008

Page 3 of 4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Cont.P.No.381 of 2026

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

rts

Cont.P.No.381 of 2026

01.04.2026

Page 4 of 4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Issues for consideration

1 issue framed by the court

AI extract

1.
Whether the respondent (Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority) committed wilful disobedience of the order dated 24.09.2024 in W.P.No.25569 of 2023 and is liable to be punished for contempt.¶11
The court held
Recording the learned Standing Counsel's submission that the order dated 24.09.2024 in W.P.No.25569 of 2023 has been complied with, together with the compliance report produced, the Court closed the Contempt Petition.ratio¶21

Statutes considered

1 provisions across 1 enactments

AI extract

Contempt of Courts Act, 1971Section 11¶11

Procedural history

How this case reached the court

AI extract

Order under challenge
Order dated 24.09.2024 in W.P.No.25569 of 2023 directing the respondent to refund the premium FSI charges collected towards the original flooring area of 4029.69 sq.mt., as per order dated 05.08.2022, from the paid amount of Rs.3,61,52,000/- after deducting the premium FSI charge for the additional area of 1245.92 sq.mt., within a period of four weeks.¶19
High Court of Judicature at Madras · 24.09.2024
Prior proceeding
By order dated 25.03.2026, this Court's Non Bailable Warrant was executed by the Assistant Commissioner of Police, Egmore, and the respondent was produced before this Court.¶20
Prior proceeding
The learned Standing Counsel for the respondent submitted that the order in W.P.No.25569 of 2023 has been complied with and produced a compliance report before this Court.¶21

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
P Dot G Constructions Private Limited, represented by its Authorized Signatory, Mr Mohan Srinivasan¶6
Mr. Ganesh
respondent
G.Prakesh IAS, The Member Secretary, The Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority¶9
Mrs.P.Veena Suresh

Coram

AI extract

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYANauthor¶4

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Madras HC
Decided on: 1 Apr 2026 · April
Registered: 3 Feb 2026
Case no.: CONT P/381/2026
CNR: HCMA010084612026
Topic: Contempt of Court
Bench: G.k. Ilanthiraiyan
Disposal: CLOSED
Case type: Cont.P.

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from G.k. Ilanthiraiyan

Manoharan Vs Babu
30 Mar 2026
Mathiazhagan Vs State Rep by
30 Mar 2026
Periyasamy Vs the Inspector of Police
30 Mar 2026
Sundari Vs K.T.Selvaraju
1 Apr 2026
B.Karuppasamy Vs State Rep.by
1 Apr 2026
S.Mahesh Guptha Vs D.Muthuraj
1 Apr 2026

Cite this judgement

P Dot G Constructions Private Limited v. G.Prakesh IAS, CONT P/381/2026 (MAD), decided on 1 April 2026.

The Madras High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Statutes1

Contempt of Courts Act, 1971Section 11

View all statutes

Procedural history3

Order dated 24.09.2024 in W.P.No.25569 of 2023 directing the respondent to refund the premium FSI charges collected towards the original flooring area of 4029.69 sq.mt., as per order dated 05.08.2022, from the paid amount of Rs.3,61,52,000/- after deducting the premium FSI charge for the additional area of 1245.92 sq.mt., within a period of four weeks.High Court of Judicature at Madras · 24.09.2024
By order dated 25.03.2026, this Court's Non Bailable Warrant was executed by the Assistant Commissioner of Police, Egmore, and the respondent was produced before this Court.
The learned Standing Counsel for the respondent submitted that the order in W.P.No.25569 of 2023 has been complied with and produced a compliance report before this Court.

View full history

Bench / Coram

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

Parties & counsel