P.Narayanan Vs R.Dayalan and 2 others

R.Dayalan Director of Local Fund Audit, No.571, Officers Building, Veterinary Hospital Campus, Opposite MC Raja Hostel, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai 600 035.

¶12

A.Danumurthy, Regional Director of Municipal Administration, No.1, A.Y.A.Nadar Road, Mettu Theru, South Rampart, Thanjavur 613 008.

¶13

A.Krishnamoorthy, Regional Joint Director of Local Fund Audit, Trichy Corporation, Water Tank Complex, Dindigul Road, Trichy 620 001.

¶14

..Contemnor(s)

¶15

__________ Page1 of 4

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

CONT P No. 293 of 2026

¶18

P.Narayanan

¶19

CONT P No. 374 of 2026

¶20

P.Narayanan Joint Director of Municipal Administration, Now Regional Director of Municipal Administration, Vellore Region, Vellore - 632 012.

¶21

..Petitioner(s)

¶22

Vs

¶23

1. K.Saravana Kumar Director if Local Fund Audit, No.571, Officers Building, Veterinary Hospital Campus, Opposite M C Raja Hostel, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai - 600 035.

¶24

1. G.Rajasekaran Regional Joint Director of Local Fund Audit, Chengalpattu.

¶25

1. R.Saranya, Commissioner, Avadi City Municipal Corporation, Chennai - 600 054.

¶26

1. K.Balasubramanian Commissioner, Kancheepuram City Municipal Corporation, Kancheepuram.

¶27

..Contemnor(s)

¶28

Contempt Petitions filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, praying to punish the respondents for willful disobeyal of the court order in W.P.Nos.27523 & 27525 of 2025 dated 28.07.2025 and to pass any other appropriate order or direction.

¶29

__________ Page2 of 4

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

CONT P No. 293 of 2026

¶32

For Petitioner(s):	Mr.S.R.Singaravelan
in both petitions	Senior Counsel for Mr.T.RANGANATHAN
For Contemnor(s):	M/S.A.Suganya,
in both petitions	Government Advocate ********

¶33

COMMON ORDER

¶34

These Contempt Petitions have been filed to punish the Respondents for

¶35

wilful disobeying the orders passed in W.P.Nos.27523 & 27525 of 2025 dated 28.07.2025.

¶36

2.Heard the learned Senior counsel appearing for the petitioner and the

¶37

learned Government Counsel appearing for the respondents.

¶38

3.The learned Senior Counsel would fairly submit that orders have been complied in the above cases.

¶39

4.Recording the submission made by the learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, these Contempt Petitions are closed. However, if the petitioner has got any grievance in the orders passed by the respondents, he is at liberty to approach the appropriate forum in accordance with law.

¶40

08-07-2026

¶41

KMI

¶42

__________ Page3 of 4

¶43

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶44

CONT P No. 293 of 2026

¶45

C.KUMARAPPAN J.