Contempt petition alleging willful disobedience of a writ order directing disposal of the petitioner's representation. Respondents produced proceedings dated 19.11.2025 rejecting the representation, showing compliance though delayed. Court held no further proceedings necessary and closed the contempt petition, leaving remedies open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.No.2092 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 03.07.2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
Cont.P.No.2092 of 2026
Dr.Ravisankar Vocational Instructor (Retired) Vaduvoor Higher Secondary School (Aided) Vaduvoor Thiruvarur District 606 301.
...Petitioner
Vs.
1.Mrs.Sugapriya The Chief Educational Officer Thiruvarur District Thiruvarur.
2.G.Karthikeyan The Headmaster Vaduvoor Higher Secondary School (Aided) Vaduvoor, Thiruvarur District. ...Respondents
Prayer: This Contempt Petition is filed Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondents for their willful deliberate, disobedience of the order of this Court made in W.P.No.34126 of 2023 on 11.12.2023.
For Petitioner(s): Mr.P.Edin Brough
For Respondent(s): Mrs.Y.Kavitha Additional Government Pleader
1/4
Cont.P.No.2092 of 2026
ORDER
This Contempt Petition is filed for willful disobedience in complying with the order of this Court dated 11.12.2023 in W.P.No.34126 of 2023.
2.When the Contempt Petition is taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents submitted that the respondents vide proceedings dated 19.11.2025 have considered and disposed of the representation of the petitioner, by rejecting the same. By stating as above, learned Additional Pleader handed over a copy of the said proceedings to the learned counsel for the petitioner.
3. The learned Additional Government Pleader submitting as above, has placed before this Court copy of the order dated 19.11.2025 along with acknowledgment in proof of the said order having been served on the petitioner.
2/4
Cont.P.No.2092 of 2026
4. In view of the aforesaid submission, since, the respondents as directed by this Court in order dated 11.12.2023 in W.P.No.34126 of 2023, having disposed of the representation submitted by the petitioner, this Court is of the considered view that the respondents have complied with the order, though with a delay.
5. In view of the above, there is no necessity to proceed further. However, it is open for the petitioner to avail further remedies in the event the petitioner is aggrieved by the proceedings dated 19.11.2025 by which the representation was disposed of.
6. Accordingly, this Contempt Petition is closed.
03.07.2026
Index : Yes/No Speaking order : Yes/No dna
3/4
Cont.P.No.2092 of 2026 T.VINOD KUMAR, J.
dna
Cont.P.No.2092 of 2026
03.07.2026
4/4
1 issue framed by the court
Whether respondents complied with the court's order dated 11.12.2023 in W.P.No.34126 of 2023 by disposing of the petitioner's representation.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dr.Ravisankar
Mrs.Sugapriya
G.Karthikeyan
T.VINOD KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
