Disposed¶22

B.Nirmala, v. Shri. S.Natarajan

Madras HC22 Apr 2026CONT P/1537/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CONT P No. 1537 of 2026, Madras High Court, decided 22-04-2026, Justice Krishnan Ramasamy. Contempt petition under Section 11 of the Contempt Courts Act by B.Nirmala against Shri. S.Natarajan, Tahsildar, Tambaram Taluk, for wilful disobedience of order dated 16.09.2025 in W.P.No. 34918 of 2025. Compliance effected by respondent's order dated 16.04.2026; petition closed; liberty reserved to petitioner to challenge the 16.04.2026 order. Advocates: J.Muthukumaran (petitioner); T.K.Saravanan, AGP (respondent).

What did the court decide?

Closure of the contempt petition, with liberty granted to the petitioner to challenge the order dated 16.04.2026 passed by the respondent. ¶22

B.Nirmala, Vs Shri. S.Natarajan — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

CONT P No. 1537 of 2026

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 22-04-2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY CONT P No. 1537 of 2026

¶6

B.Nirmala, W/o. G.Bakthavatchalam, Plot No.C S 5, Babu Street, Kousalya Nagar, Chitlapakkam, Chennai-600 064.

¶7

Petitioner(s)

¶8

¶9

Shri. S.Natarajan The Tahsildar, Tambaram Taluk, Kadaperi, G.S.T. Road, Chennai-600 045.

¶10

Contemnor(s)

¶11

PRAYER

¶12

Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt Courts Act, to punish the respondent herein for wilful disobedience to the order dated 16.09.2025 passed in W.P.No. 34918 of 2025.

¶13

For Petitioner: Mr.J.Muthukumaran

¶14

For Respondent: Mr.T.K.Saravanan, AGP

¶15

ORDER

¶16

This Contempt petition has been filed to punish the respondent herein for

¶17

willful disobedience to the order dated 16.09.2025 passed in W.P.No. 34918 of

¶18

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

CONT P No. 1537 of 2026

¶21

When this matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the respondent would submit that pursuant to the order passed by this Court, the respondent had considered the petitioner’s representation and passed order on 16.04.2026. Hence, he would submit that the aforesaid order dated 16.09.2025 was duly complied with by the respondents and requests this Court to close the present petition.

¶22

In view of the above, it is clear that no further order is required in this petition. Therefore, this contempt petition is closed. The petitioner is granted liberty to challenge the order dated 16.04.2026 passed by the respondent.

¶23

22-04-2026

¶24

nsa Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No

¶25

¶26

Shri. S.Natarajan The Tahsildar, Tambaram Taluk, Kadaperi, G.S.T. Road, Chennai-600 045.

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

CONT P No. 1537 of 2026

¶29