Allowed¶23

Muthuramu, v. State of Tamilnadu

Madras HC29 Jun 2026CMP(MD)/7958/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Condonation of delay; 547 days; delay in representing second appeal; SA(MD)No.SR79060 of 2024; CMP(MD) No.7958 of 2026; Madurai Bench of Madras High Court; Muthuramu v. State of Tamilnadu; District Collector Ramanathapuram; District Revenue Officer; Revenue Divisional Officer; Tahsildar Paramakudi; Pandi; affidavit reasons satisfactory; Registry to number appeal; list for admission; T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.; decision dated 29.06.2026.

What did the court decide?

Delay of 547 days in representing Second Appeal SA(MD)No.SR79060 of 2024 condoned; Registry directed to number the appeal, if otherwise in order, and list it for admission. ¶23

Muthuramu, Vs State of Tamilnadu — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

CMP(MD). No.7958 of 2026

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

Dated : 29.06.2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI

¶6

CMP(MD). No.7958 of 2026 in SA(MD)No.SR79060 of 2024

Muthuramu,,

... Petitioner

Vs.

State of Tamilnadu,, Represented by the District Collector, Ramanathapuram District.

¶11

The District Revenue Officer,, Office of the District Revenue Officer, Ramanathapuram District..

¶12

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Ramanthapuram District.

¶13

The Tahsildar,, Office of the Tahsildar, Paramakudi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District..

¶14

Pandi ... Respondents

¶15

1/4

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

CMP(MD). No.7958 of 2026

¶18

PRAYER :- To Condone the delay of 547 days in representing the above Second Appeal and render justice.

¶19

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai Advocate. For Respondents : Mr.R.S.Sivaram, Counsel For Government of Tamilnadu (Civil side) for R1to R4,

¶20

ORDER

¶21

This Petition is filed to Condone the delay of 547 days in representing the above Second Appeal.

¶22

The reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, are

¶23

satisfactory. Hence, this Petition is allowed and the delay of 547 days is hereby condoned.

¶24

Registry is directed to number the second appeal, if it is otherwise in

¶25

other and list the appeal “for admission”.

29.06.2026

2/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

CMP(MD). No.7958 of 2026

¶31

¶32

The District Collector, Ramanathapuram District.

¶33

The District Revenue Officer,, Office of the District Revenue Officer, Ramanathapuram District.

¶34

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Ramanthapuram District.

¶35

The Tahsildar,, Office of the Tahsildar, Paramakudi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District.

¶36

3/4

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

CMP(MD). No.7958 of 2026

¶39

T.V.THAMILSELVI,J.

¶40

¶41

CMP(MD). No.7958 of 2026 in SA(MD)No.SR79060 of 2024

¶42

29.06.2026

¶43

4/4

¶44

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Muthuramu, v. State of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Muthuramu, v. State of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Loganayaki alias S.Naveena Vs S.Kavinkumar

Parvathi Vs Arjunan (Died) 1. Pachaiyammal

R.Santhi Vs E.Viswanathan

R.Senthil Kumar Vs Bharathi Kannan

Charles Vs Aasirvatham

Jegajothi Vs Subbuthai