A petition to condone a 66-day delay in filing a writ appeal, attributed to time taken for legal opinion and administrative approval of the appeal, was allowed and the Registry directed to number the appeal if in order.
Delay of 66 days in filing the writ appeal condoned; Registry to number the appeal if otherwise in order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CMP.(MD)No.5293 of 2026 in WA.(MD)SR.No.31908 of 2026
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J and
R. SAKTHIVEL, J
This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 66 days in filing the Writ Appeal against the order dated 02.01.2026 made in W.P(MD)No. 13158 of 2019.
2.In the affidavit filed in support of this petition, it is stated that matter had been referred for obtaining legal opinion and thereafter, the administration has also approved for filing an appeal and there has been delay in the said process.
3.Notice had been directed and notice was served. The learned counsel entered appearance for the respondents.
4.Taking the above stated facts into consideration, the delay stands condoned and this petition is allowed. The Registry is directed to number the
1/3
appeal if it is otherwise in order and post it for admission. When the matter is listed for admission, the name of the respective counsels, who appeared for the respondents, to be printed in the cause list.
(C.V.K.,J) & (R.S.V.,J)
30.06.2026
gns
2/3
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J and R. SAKTHIVEL, J
gns
CMP.(MD)No.5293 of 2026 in WA.(MD)SR.No.31908 of 2026
30.06.2026
3/3
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
R. SAKTHIVEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
