Manoharan, v. G.Lakshmi
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madras High Court condoned a 333-day delay in filing civil miscellaneous petitions to set aside abatement caused by the death of the fifth respondent and to implead the legal heirs (sixth and seventh respondents) in an ongoing civil suit.
What did the court decide?
The Civil Miscellaneous Petitions CMP(MD) Nos. 3275 to 3277 of 2026 were allowed to condone the 333-day delay and bring respondents 6 and 7 as the legal heirs of the deceased respondent 5.
What the court decided
CMP(MD) NOS. 3275 to 3277 of 2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 22-04-2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P.VADAMALAI
CMP(MD) NOS. 3275 to 3277 of 2026
in
AS(MD) NO. 232 of 2022
Manoharan
through his power agent N. Ramesh
Petitioner(s) in all petitions
Vs
1.G.Lakshmi
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing petitions to set aside abatement due to the death of a party and bring legal heirs on record should be condoned.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Manoharan
- respondent
G.Lakshmi
- respondent
G.Mathiyarasan
- respondent
G.Ravichandran
- respondent
M.Thilaga
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court