Allowed¶24

The State of Tamil Nadu v. L Parthasarathy

Madras HC2 Feb 2026CMP(MD)/18906/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Condonation of delay; Section 5 of Limitation Act; 304 days delay; writ appeal W.A.(MD) SR No.99900 of 2025; order dated 18.12.2024 in W.P.(MD) No.29060 of 2024; State of Tamil Nadu Rural Development Department; District Collector Thoothukudi; Block Development Officer Kovilpatti; L.Parthasarathy; Principal Accountant General (A&E); consent/no-objection condonation; Registry directed to number writ appeal and post for admission; Madurai Bench of Madras High Court; dated 02.02.2026.

What did the court decide?

Delay of 304 days in filing writ appeal W.A.(MD) SR No.99900 of 2025 condoned; Registry directed to number the writ appeal, if papers are otherwise in order, and post it for admission in the usual course. ¶24

The State of Tamil Nadu Vs L Parthasarathy — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

C.M.P.(MD) No.18906 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 02.02.2026

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN

¶6

C.M.P.(MD) No.18906 of 2025 in

¶7

W.A.(MD) SR No.99900 of 2025

¶8

1.The State of Tamil Nadu rep.by its Secretary Rural Development Department Chennai

¶9

2.The District Collector Thoothukudi District Thoothukudi

¶10

3.The Block Development Officer Kovilpatti Panchayat Union Kovilpatti Taluk Thoothukudi District ... Petitioners

¶11

-vs-

¶12

1.L.Parthasarathy

¶13

2.The Principal Accountant General (A&E) No.361, Annasalai Chennai ... Respondents

¶14

_____________ Page 1 of 4_

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

C.M.P.(MD) No.18906 of 2025

¶17

PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act to condone the delay

¶18

of 304 days in filing the above writ appeal as against the order dated 18.12.2024, passed in W.P.(MD) No.29060 of 2024.

¶19

For Petitioners : Mr.S.P.Maharajan Special Government Pleader For Respondents : Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai for R1 Mr.P.Gunasekaran for R2

¶20

O R D E R

¶21

[Order of the Court was made by DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.]

¶22

This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 304 days in the filing the above writ appeal.

¶23

2. Learned counsels appearing for the first respondent and the second respondent have not raised any serious objection for allowing this civil miscellaneous petition.

¶24

3. Since there is no objection on the part of the respondents for allowing this civil miscellaneous petition, this civil miscellaneous petition is allowed and the delay of 304 days in filing the above writ appeal is condoned.

¶25

Page 2 of 4

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

C.M.P.(MD) No.18906 of 2025

¶28

4. Registry is directed to number the writ appeal, if the papers are

¶29

otherwise in order, and post the same for admission in the usual course.

¶30

[G.J., J.] [K.K.R.K., J.]