Balasubramanian v. G.Natarajan
Case brief
What is this about?
Delay condonation refused; 900-day delay in representing second appeal; CMP dismissed and SA rejected at SR stage following counsel's report of settlement between parties. Parties: Balasubramanian, Nagarajan (appellants/petitioners) v. G.Natarajan (respondent). Advocates: H.Lakshmi Shankar for petitioners; R.Suriya Narayanan for respondent. Forum chain: O.S.No.378 of 2013, Additional Subordinate Judge, Pudukkottai (decree 05.04.2018) reversed in A.S.No.17 of 2018, Principal District and Sessions Judge, Pudukkottai (13.12.2021). Bench: T.V.ThamilSelvi, J., Madras High Court Madurai Bench; decided 09/07/2026. No statutes cited, no precedents cited, no monetary amounts.
What did the court decide?
Upon counsel appearing on either side submitting that the dispute had already been settled between the parties (though instructions were awaited), the court recorded that submission and dismissed the Civil Miscellaneous Petition seeking condonation of the 900-day delay.