Allowed¶33

K.R.v.Selvam v. The Chief Controlling Revenue Authority- cum- Inspector General of Registration

Madras HC12 Feb 2026CMP(MD)/18244/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court, Madurai Bench; CMP(MD) 18244 of 2024 in CMA(MD) SR 25161 of 2022; condonation of delay; 917 days; re-presentation of civil miscellaneous appeal; stamp duty/registration matter; Chief Controlling Revenue Authority-cum IG Registration; Special Deputy Collector (Stamps) Virudhunagar; Joint Sub Registrar-II Karaikudi, Sivagangai; Government Advocate endorsement; petition allowed; P. Vadamalai J.; 12-02-2026.

What did the court decide?

Condonation of the delay of 917 days in representing the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal in C.M.A.(MD)SR No.25161 of 2022. ¶33

K.R.v.Selvam Vs The Chief Controlling Revenue Authority- cum- Inspector General of Registration — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

CMP(MD) NO. 18244 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 12-02-2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P.VADAMALAI

¶6

CMP(MD) NO. 18244 of 2024

¶7

¶8

CMA(MD) SR NO. 25161 of 2022

K.R.V.Selvam

Petitioner(s)

1.The Chief Controlling Revenue Authority- cumInspector General of Registration, Chennai.

¶13

2.The Special Deputy Collector (Stamps), Virudhunagar, Virudhunagar District.

¶14

3.The Joint Sub Registrar-II, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District.

¶15

Respondent(s)

¶16

For Petitioner(s):

¶17

Mr.M.Natarajan, Advocate

¶18

For Respondent(s):

¶19

Mr.K.R.Badurus Zaman, Government Advocate

¶20

1/4

¶21

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶22

CMP(MD) NO. 18244 of 2024

¶23

Prayer :

¶24

Prayer : Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed to condone the delay of 917 days in representing the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal in C.M.A. (MD)SR No.25161 of 2022 on the file of this Court.

¶25

ORDER

¶26

This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 917 days in representing the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal in C.M.A.(MD)SR No.25161 of 2022 before this Court.

¶27

Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the affidavit filed in support of this petition.

¶28

The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents has not raised any objections to allow this petition and has also made an endorsement in the bundle to that effect.

¶29