Partly allowed¶32

A.M.Rajarathinam v. ANTONYAMMAL(DIED),1)Malaravan

Madras HC2 Jan 2026CMP(MD)/12666/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Return of original documents to petitioner; Order 13 Rule 9 C.P.C.; substitution with certified copy; Ex.B.1 to Ex.B.4; District Munsif Court Valliyoor; pending disposal of second appeal SA(MD)No.391 of 2021; Madurai Bench of Madras High Court; K. Murali Shankar; Registry direction; acknowledgement from counsel on record; civil miscellaneous petition; A.M.Rajarathinam; Antoniammal (Died); Malaravan; Vijayakumar; Punitha; Rajan; Maria Mohana; Maria Vimala.

What did the court decide?

Return of original Ex.B.1 to the petitioner ordered, subject to substitution of the registration or certified copy and proper acknowledgement from the counsel on record; the petitioner had restricted his prayer with respect to Ex.B.2 to Ex.B.4, so no return was directed for those documents. ¶32

A.M.Rajarathinam Vs ANTONYAMMAL(DIED),1)Malaravan — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

CMP(MD)No.12666 of 2024 in SA(MD)No.391 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 02-01-2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR

¶6

CMP(MD) No.12666 of 2024

SA(MD)No.391 of 2021

A.M.Rajarathinam

Petitioner/ 1^st Respondent

Antoniammal (Died)

1.Malaravan

2.Vijayakumar

3.Punitha

¶16

4.Rajan

¶17

Respondents 1 to 4/ Appellants 2 to 5

¶18

5.Maria Mohana 6.Maria Vimala

¶19

Respondents 5 & 6/ Respondents 2 & 3

¶20

This Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Order 13 Rule 9 C.P.C. praying to return the original title deeds marked as Ex's B-1 to B-4 on the file of District Munsif Court, Valliyoor to the petitioner by permitting the petitioner to substitute with certified copy of Ex's B-1 to B-4 in place thereof, pending disposal of the above second appeal.

¶21

1/2

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

CMP(MD)No.12666 of 2024 in SA(MD)No.391 of 2021

¶24

For Petitioner: M/s.M.Maria Vinola, Advocate

¶25

For Respondents: Mr.S.Kumar, Advocate for R1 to R4

¶26

No appearance for R6

¶27

ORDER

¶28

The above petition has been filed seeking orders to return the original documents Ex.B.1 to Ex.B.4 produced by the petitioner during the trial.

¶29

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents 1 to 4. No representation for the sixth respondent.

¶30

When the matter was taken up earlier, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner requested time for production of registration copies of the original documents. Today, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is producing the registration copy of Ex.B.1 and is restricting his prayer with respect to Ex.B.2 to Ex.B.4.

¶31

4.The learned counsel appearing for the respondents 1 to 4 would submit that they are not having any objections.

¶32

Considering the above, this petition is ordered. The Registry is directed to return the original Ex.B.1 by substituting the registration or certified copy on getting proper acknowledgement from the counsel on record.

02-01-2026

CSM