Allowed¶28

V.Guard Industries Limited v. M/s.Kangaro Industries

Madras HC17 Apr 2026CMP/9726/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Condonation of delay; Madras High Court; CMP No. 9726 of 2026 in LPA.SR.No.206637 of 2025; V.Guard Industries Limited v. Kangaro Industries and Registrar of Trade Marks; 23 days' delay in filing LPA against judgement of Learned Judge in (T) CMA(TM).no.193 of 2023 dated 21-08-2025; listed 'for reporting compliance'; compliance with condition in earlier order dated 17.04.2026; Registry directed to number appeal and post in usual course; trade marks appeal.

What did the court decide?

Delay of 23 days in filing LPA.SR.No.206637 of 2025 condoned; Registry directed to number the appeal and post it in usual course, if the papers are otherwise in order. ¶28

V.Guard Industries Limited Vs M/s.Kangaro Industries — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

CMP No. 9726 of 2026

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 27-04-2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P. VELMURUGAN AND THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI

¶6

CMP No. 9726 of 2026 in

¶7

LPA.SR.No.206637 of 2025

¶8

V.Guard Industries Limited

¶9

Rep. by its Authorized Signatory Ms.Jasleen Kaur, 42/962 Vennala High School Road, Vennala, Kochi, Kerala 682 028.

¶10

..Appellant(s)

¶11

¶12

M/s.KANGARO INDUSTRIES B-XXX-6754 Focal Point, Ludhiana 141010, Punjab.

¶13

The Registrar of Trade Marks Trade Marks Registry, IPR Building, Industrial Estate, SIDCO RMT Godwon Road, Near Eagle Flask Factory, GST Road, Guindy, Chennai 600 032.

¶14

..Respondent(s)

¶15

Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed to condone the delay of 23 days in filing the above LPA against the impugned judgement of the Learned Judge in (T) CMA(TM).no.193 of 2023 dated 21-08-2025.

¶16

For Appellant(s): Mr.M.S.Bharath For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Rajesh Ramanathan for R1

¶17

__________ Page1 of 2

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

CMP No. 9726 of 2026

¶20

P.VELMURUGAN, J.

¶21

AND K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J.

¶22

hvk

¶23

ORDER

¶24

(Order of the Court was made by P.VELMURUGAN,J.)

¶25

Today, the matter is listed under the caption ‘for reporting compliance’.

¶26

2.The learned counsel for the 1^st respondent submitted that the petitioner

¶27

has complied with the condition imposed in the earlier order of this Court dated 17.04.2026.

¶28

3.In view of the same, the delay stands condoned.

¶29

(P.V.,J.) (K.G.T.,J.) 27-04-2026

¶30

hvk

¶31

Note: Registry is directed to number the appeal and post in usual course, if the papers are otherwise in order

¶32

¶33

The Registrar of Trade Marks Trade Marks Registry, IPR Building, Industrial Estate, SIDCO RMT Godwon Road, Near Eagle Flask Factory, GST Road, Guindy, Chennai 600 032.

¶34

CMP No. 9726 of 2026

¶35

in LPA.SR.No.206637 of 2025

¶36

__________ Page2 of 2

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

V.Guard Industries Limited v. M/s.Kangaro Industries

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V.Guard Industries Limited v. M/s.Kangaro Industries

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Union of India Vs P.Karuppannan

Vlcc Health Care Limited Vs Veeram Raja

R.Srinivasan Vs the District Collector / Arbitrator

Sivan Vs Mr. Rajini

S.S.Rajendran Vs Vasanthi and 3 others

Deendayal Totla Vs Varalakshmi Starch Industries Pvt. Ltd.