Allowed

Rajeswari (Deceased) 1. Umadevi v. T.V.K. Vasudevaraj (Deceased) 1. v Sekar @ Rajasekar

Madras HC5 Feb 2026CMP/4236/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In SA No. 434 of 2008, the single judge allowed a civil miscellaneous petition seeking to implead the legal heirs of a deceased respondent as legal representatives to proceed with the special application.

What did the court decide?

Application to implead legal heirs of deceased 1st respondent as respondents 10 and 11 in SA No. 434 of 2008 allowed.

Rajeswari (Deceased) 1. Umadevi Vs T.V.K… — Succession and Inheritance | Madras HC (2026)

¶1

CMP No. 4236 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 05-02-2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN

¶6

CMP No. 4236 of 2025

¶7

in SA NO. 434 OF 2008

¶8

Rajeswari (Deceased)

¶9

Umadevi D/o. Boopalachandran, Bharathiyar Street, Arani Town, Tiruvannamalai District.

¶10

..Appellant(s)

¶11

¶12

T.V.K. Vasudevaraj (Deceased)

¶13

V. Sekar @ Rajasekar S/o. T.V.K. VAsudevaraj,

¶14

22/2, Bharathiar St, Arani Town 632 301.

¶15

V. Rajkumar S/o. T.V.K. Vasudevaraj,

¶16

22/2, Bharathiar St, Arani Town 632 301.

¶17

V. V. Christopher @ Selvanathan S/o. T.V.K. VAsudevaraj, 22/2, Bharathiar St, Arani Town 632 301.

¶18

T.V.K.Natarajchandran (Deceased)

¶19

Municipal Commissioner Arani Municipal Office, Arani.

¶20

Asst. Divisional Engineer Town Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Arani.

¶21

Manickammal (Deceased)

¶22

6. T.V.K. Jayasakthi

¶23

__________ Page1 of 4

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judishttps://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

CMP No. 4236 of 2025

¶26

S/o. T.V.K. Kuppusamy, Dhandhumariamman Koil St, Arani.

¶27

T.V.K. Bell Chandran S/o. T.V.K. Kuppusamy, V.A.K. Nagar, Arani. T.V.K. Radha Bai (Deceased)

¶28

T.V.K. Rajeswari S/o. Captain Subramani, II Street, Gandhi Nagar, Arani.

¶29

Luri Premavathy D/o. Late. T.V.K. Vasudevaraj, 22/2, Bharathiar St, Arani Town 632 301.

¶30

10.Grace Padmavathy D/o. Late. T.V.K. Vasudevaraj, 22/2, Bharathiar St, Arani Town 632 301.

¶31

..Respondent(s)

¶32

PRAYER – This Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Order XXII Rule 4 of C.P.C., to bring the proposed respondents 9 and 10/legal heirs of deceased 1^st respondent TVK. Vasudevaraj herein as respondents 10 and 11 in the above SA No.434 of 2008.

¶33

For Appellant(s): Mrs.D.Kamatchi

¶34

O R D E R

¶35

This Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed to bring the proposed respondents 9 and 10/legal heirs of deceased 1st respondent TVK. Vasudevaraj herein as respondents 10 and 11 in the above SA No.434 of 2008.

¶36

__________ Page2 of 4

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judishttps://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

CMP No. 4236 of 2025

¶39

2.I am satisfied with the reasons given in the affidavit filed in support of

¶40

this petition. Hence, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered.

¶41

05-02-2026 Index: Yes/No (2/6) Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No

¶42

GSA

¶43

__________ Page3 of 4

¶44

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judishttps://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶45

CMP No. 4236 of 2025

¶46

V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN J.

¶47

GSA

¶48

CMP No. 4236 of 2025

¶49

in SA NO. 434 OF 2008

¶50

05-02-2026 (2/6)

¶51

__________ Page4 of 4

¶52

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judishttps://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Rajeswari (Deceased) 1. Umadevi v. T.V.K. Vasudevaraj (Deceased) 1. v Sekar @ Rajasekar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajeswari (Deceased) 1. Umadevi v. T.V.K. Vasudevaraj (Deceased) 1. v Sekar @ Rajasekar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Baskaran Vs The Secretary to Government

S.N.L.Jayabalan Vs Arulmigu Ananda Vigneswarar

T.Selvam Vs The Additional Secretary to Government

R.Saravanan Vs the Commissioner

Rajeswari (Deceased) Vs T.V.K. Vasudevaraj (Deceased) 1. v. Sekar @ Rajasekar

Chinnappa Reddy(Died) Vs Dharani Reddy (Died)and 2 Others